Developer · London
Royal Mail Group Plc.
A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 32 applications in 17 boroughs, seeking 122 residential units, at a 92% approval rate, 2003–20.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.
Developer122 units sought17 boroughs92% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →32
Applications
London 2003–20
—
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
What they build — by scheme type
Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.
Their planning record — policies in play
The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.
Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits
How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.
The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
Show all 17 rows
Where this developer builds, 2003–20.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.
Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2015-03-19
Wandsworth
Certificate of Lawfulness - Proposed
Approved
2014-02-10
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2008-06-19
Tower Hamlets
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-04-04
Newham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2007-11-08
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2007-06-18
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Withdrawn
2007-05-16
Tower Hamlets
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-12-18
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-04-04
Waltham Forest
Certificate of Lawful Development - Proposed
Approved
2006-01-24
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2005-11-16
Newham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-10-12
Westminster
Conservation Area Consent Appl (CAC)
Approved
2005-09-22
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2005-09-22
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2005-09-02
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Refused
2005-07-27
Sutton
Advert Application
Approved
2005-05-19
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-05-13
Hackney
Listed Building Consent
Withdrawn
2005-04-27
Hackney
Listed Building Consent
Withdrawn
2005-03-15
Sutton
Full Application
Approved
2005-02-01
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2005-01-06
Tower Hamlets
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-07-12
Richmond Upon Thames
Outline Application
Withdrawn
2004-06-03
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2004-03-24
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-03-09
Sutton
Full Application
Approved
2004-02-03
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2003-07-25
Camden
Request for Observations to Adjoining Borough
No objection
2003-01-17
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2015-03-19
Wandsworth
Certificate of Lawfulness - Proposed
Approved
2014-02-10
Show all 39 rows
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2008-06-19
Tower Hamlets
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-04-04
Newham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2007-11-08
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2007-06-18
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Withdrawn
2007-05-16
Tower Hamlets
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-12-18
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-04-04
Waltham Forest
Certificate of Lawful Development - Proposed
Approved
2006-01-24
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2005-11-16
Newham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-10-12
Westminster
Conservation Area Consent Appl (CAC)
Approved
2005-09-22
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2005-09-22
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2005-09-02
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Refused
2005-07-27
Sutton
Advert Application
Approved
2005-05-19
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-05-13
Hackney
Listed Building Consent
Withdrawn
2005-04-27
Hackney
Listed Building Consent
Withdrawn
2005-03-15
Sutton
Full Application
Approved
2005-02-01
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2005-01-06
Tower Hamlets
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-07-12
Richmond Upon Thames
Outline Application
Withdrawn
2004-06-03
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2004-03-24
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-03-09
Sutton
Full Application
Approved
2004-02-03
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2003-07-25
Camden
Request for Observations to Adjoining Borough
No objection
2003-01-17
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperRoyal Mail Group Plc
Coverage17 London boroughs
Applications32 (2003–20)
Units sought122
Approval rate92%
London rank#1015 of 16,342
Who decides here
Related investigations
Sources & method
- [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
- [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.