Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersSfi Group Plc
Planning AtlasDevelopersSFI Group Plc
Developer · London

SFI Group Plc.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 21 applications in 10 boroughs, at a 65% approval rate, 1998–05.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer10 boroughs65% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
21
Applications
London 1998–05
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
0%50%100%’98’99’00’01’02’03’04’05
What they build — by scheme type
23decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate

Where this developer builds, 1998–05.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Wandsworth
Alter or Extend a Listed Building
Refused
2005-06-17
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Refused
2005-06-17
Wandsworth
Alter or Extend a Listed Building
Refused
2004-10-22
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Refused
2004-10-22
Westminster
Applic. for tables and chairs
Refused
2004-08-19
Wandsworth
Variation of Condition
Approved
2003-11-17
Westminster
Applic. for tables and chairs
Refused
2003-11-10
Wandsworth
Alter or Extend a Listed Building
Approved
2003-01-23
Islington
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2002-12-09
Wandsworth
Variation of Condition
Approved
2002-11-04
Westminster
Applic. for tables and chairs
Approved
2002-09-05
Kingston Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2002-08-13
Wandsworth
Alter or Extend a Listed Building
Approved
2002-07-03
Wandsworth
Advertisements
Approved
2002-07-03
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2001-10-04
City Of London
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2001-09-11
City Of London
Advertisement Consent
Withdrawn
2001-09-11
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2001-05-01
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2001-01-04
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-10-02
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-09-26
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-07-17
Camden
Advertisement Consent
Split
2000-05-15
City Of London
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2000-05-05
Merton
Advertisement Consent
Withdrawn
1999-12-31
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-11-12
Islington
Full Planning Application
Refused
1999-09-20
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-04-12
Islington
Advertisement Consent
Refused
1999-01-27
Sutton
Full Application
Approved
1998-11-23
Wandsworth
Alter or Extend a Listed Building
Refused
2005-06-17
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Refused
2005-06-17
Wandsworth
Alter or Extend a Listed Building
Refused
2004-10-22
Show all 30 rows
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Refused
2004-10-22
Westminster
Applic. for tables and chairs
Refused
2004-08-19
Wandsworth
Variation of Condition
Approved
2003-11-17
Westminster
Applic. for tables and chairs
Refused
2003-11-10
Wandsworth
Alter or Extend a Listed Building
Approved
2003-01-23
Islington
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2002-12-09
Wandsworth
Variation of Condition
Approved
2002-11-04
Westminster
Applic. for tables and chairs
Approved
2002-09-05
Kingston Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2002-08-13
Wandsworth
Alter or Extend a Listed Building
Approved
2002-07-03
Wandsworth
Advertisements
Approved
2002-07-03
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2001-10-04
City Of London
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2001-09-11
City Of London
Advertisement Consent
Withdrawn
2001-09-11
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2001-05-01
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2001-01-04
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-10-02
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-09-26
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-07-17
Camden
Advertisement Consent
Split
2000-05-15
City Of London
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2000-05-05
Merton
Advertisement Consent
Withdrawn
1999-12-31
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-11-12
Islington
Full Planning Application
Refused
1999-09-20
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-04-12
Islington
Advertisement Consent
Refused
1999-01-27
Sutton
Full Application
Approved
1998-11-23
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperSFI Group Plc
Coverage10 London boroughs
Applications21 (1998–05)
Units sought
Approval rate65%
London rank#5144 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.