Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersShanly Homes Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopersShanly Homes Ltd
Developer · London

Shanly Homes Ltd.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 34 applications in 7 boroughs, seeking 426 residential units, at a 81% approval rate, 2009–24.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer426 units sought7 boroughs81% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
34
Applications
London 2009–24
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
0%50%100%’09’10’11’12’13’14’15’16’17’21’24
What they build — by scheme type
47decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
11
73%
6
100%
Show all 7 rows
5
100%
1

Where this developer builds, 2009–24.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2024-05-28
Bexley
Detailed Planning Application
Refused
2021-01-21
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Approved
2017-12-29
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Approved
2017-12-29
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2016-09-01
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2016-06-08
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2016-05-24
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2015-12-09
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2015-11-12
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2015-07-14
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2015-07-07
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
No determination
2015-06-09
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2015-01-13
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2014-09-19
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2014-08-19
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2014-06-30
Merton
Discharge of Planning Conditions
Approved
2014-06-19
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Withdrawn
2014-06-19
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Withdrawn
2014-06-19
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2014-06-16
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
2014-04-17
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Approved
2014-01-30
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Withdrawn
2013-12-19
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
No determination
2013-11-06
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Refused
2013-08-05
Kingston Upon Thames
Deed of Variation
Approved
2013-01-11
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Approved
2012-11-09
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2012-07-24
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2012-06-20
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Approved
2012-03-22
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2012-02-09
Merton
Discharge of Planning Conditions
Approved
2012-01-17
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Approved
2011-10-07
Kingston Upon Thames
Approval of Reserved Matters
Approved
2011-03-07
Merton
Discharge of Planning Conditions
Withdrawn
2011-03-03
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-01-28
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-01-19
Harrow
Outline Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2010-12-03
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2010-11-29
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2010-11-09
Kingston Upon Thames
Tree Preservation Order
Not required
2010-10-21
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2010-09-29
Brent
Householder
Approved
2010-07-08
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-11-19
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Approved
2009-02-18
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2024-05-28
Bexley
Detailed Planning Application
Refused
2021-01-21
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Approved
2017-12-29
Show all 48 rows
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Approved
2017-12-29
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2016-09-01
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2016-06-08
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2016-05-24
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2015-12-09
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2015-11-12
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2015-07-14
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2015-07-07
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
No determination
2015-06-09
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2015-01-13
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2014-09-19
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2014-08-19
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2014-06-30
Merton
Discharge of Planning Conditions
Approved
2014-06-19
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Withdrawn
2014-06-19
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Withdrawn
2014-06-19
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2014-06-16
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
2014-04-17
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Approved
2014-01-30
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Withdrawn
2013-12-19
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
No determination
2013-11-06
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Refused
2013-08-05
Kingston Upon Thames
Deed of Variation
Approved
2013-01-11
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Approved
2012-11-09
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2012-07-24
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2012-06-20
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Approved
2012-03-22
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2012-02-09
Merton
Discharge of Planning Conditions
Approved
2012-01-17
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Approved
2011-10-07
Kingston Upon Thames
Approval of Reserved Matters
Approved
2011-03-07
Merton
Discharge of Planning Conditions
Withdrawn
2011-03-03
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-01-28
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-01-19
Harrow
Outline Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2010-12-03
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2010-11-29
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2010-11-09
Kingston Upon Thames
Tree Preservation Order
Not required
2010-10-21
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2010-09-29
Brent
Householder
Approved
2010-07-08
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-11-19
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Approved
2009-02-18
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperShanly Homes Ltd
Coverage7 London boroughs
Applications34 (2009–24)
Units sought426
Approval rate81%
London rank#523 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.