Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersShoethorn Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopersShoethorn Ltd
Developer · London

Shoethorn Ltd.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 8 applications in 2 boroughs, seeking 2 residential units, at a 75% approval rate, 1996–13.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer2 units sought2 boroughs75% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
8
Applications
London 1996–13
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
0%50%100%’96’97’98’99’01’04’13
What they build — by scheme type
9decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate

Where this developer builds, 1996–13.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2013-06-13
Lambeth
Certificate of Lawful Use proposed
Approved
2004-12-15
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2001-07-24
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2001-04-10
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
1999-12-23
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1998-09-15
Lambeth
DO NOT USE HISTORIC PLANNING APPS ONLY
Approved
1997-02-14
Lambeth
DO NOT USE HISTORIC PLANNING APPS ONLY
Approved
1996-07-10
Lambeth
DO NOT USE HISTORIC PLANNING APPS ONLY
Approved
1996-02-26
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2013-06-13
Lambeth
Certificate of Lawful Use proposed
Approved
2004-12-15
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2001-07-24
Show all 9 rows
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2001-04-10
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
1999-12-23
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1998-09-15
Lambeth
DO NOT USE HISTORIC PLANNING APPS ONLY
Approved
1997-02-14
Lambeth
DO NOT USE HISTORIC PLANNING APPS ONLY
Approved
1996-07-10
Lambeth
DO NOT USE HISTORIC PLANNING APPS ONLY
Approved
1996-02-26
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperShoethorn Ltd
Coverage2 London boroughs
Applications8 (1996–13)
Units sought2
Approval rate75%
London rank#4470 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.