Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersStructadene Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopers` Structadene Limited
Developer · London

` Structadene Limited.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 21 applications in 6 boroughs, seeking 61 residential units, at a 69% approval rate, 1997–16.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer61 units sought6 boroughs69% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
21
Applications
London 1997–16
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
0%50%100%’97’98’99’00’01’02’03’04’05’16
What they build — by scheme type
36decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
19
82%
5
80%
Show all 6 rows

Where this developer builds, 1997–16.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Camden
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2016-07-14
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2016-06-28
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Withdrawn
2009-04-02
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2005-09-13
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2005-09-13
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2005-08-16
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2005-07-29
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2005-07-29
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2005-07-04
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2005-07-04
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2005-07-04
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2005-07-04
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-04-08
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2004-09-29
Hackney
Listed Building Consent
Refused
2004-09-29
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-06-10
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-11-04
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2003-08-12
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2003-06-26
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2002-06-20
Westminster
Conservation Area Consent Appl (CAC)
Not required
2002-06-20
Tower Hamlets
Approval of Details -Discharge Condition
Approved
2001-11-27
Waltham Forest
Certificate of Lawful Development - Existing
Approved
2001-10-11
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2001-01-08
Tower Hamlets
Approval of Details -Discharge Condition
Approved
2000-10-12
Hackney
Outline Planning Permission - All/Some Matters Reserved
Withdrawn
2000-08-17
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2000-08-15
Islington
Certificate of Lawfulness (Existing)
Approved
2000-05-09
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-11-22
Tower Hamlets
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-04-07
Westminster
LBC applic on unlisted building
Withdrawn
1997-11-03
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Withdrawn
1997-11-03
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1997-09-29
Westminster
Conservation Area Consent Appl (CAC)
Not required
1997-04-29
Tower Hamlets
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1997-02-27
Camden
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2016-07-14
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2016-06-28
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Withdrawn
2009-04-02
Show all 36 rows
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2005-09-13
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2005-09-13
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2005-08-16
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2005-07-29
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2005-07-29
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2005-07-04
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2005-07-04
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2005-07-04
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2005-07-04
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-04-08
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2004-09-29
Hackney
Listed Building Consent
Refused
2004-09-29
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-06-10
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-11-04
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2003-08-12
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2003-06-26
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2002-06-20
Westminster
Conservation Area Consent Appl (CAC)
Not required
2002-06-20
Tower Hamlets
Approval of Details -Discharge Condition
Approved
2001-11-27
Waltham Forest
Certificate of Lawful Development - Existing
Approved
2001-10-11
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2001-01-08
Tower Hamlets
Approval of Details -Discharge Condition
Approved
2000-10-12
Hackney
Outline Planning Permission - All/Some Matters Reserved
Withdrawn
2000-08-17
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2000-08-15
Islington
Certificate of Lawfulness (Existing)
Approved
2000-05-09
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-11-22
Tower Hamlets
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-04-07
Westminster
LBC applic on unlisted building
Withdrawn
1997-11-03
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Withdrawn
1997-11-03
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1997-09-29
Westminster
Conservation Area Consent Appl (CAC)
Not required
1997-04-29
Tower Hamlets
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1997-02-27
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
Developer` Structadene Limited
Coverage6 London boroughs
Applications21 (1997–16)
Units sought61
Approval rate69%
London rank#1413 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.