Planning Atlas
AtlasConsultantsThe Hards Partnership
Planning AtlasConsultantsThe Hards Partnership
Planning consultancy · London

The Hards Partnership.

A planning consultancy acting for applicants across London. Wins consent on 85% of applicationsabove the London average of 79% — across 89 applications in 6 boroughs, 1996–11.[1] Where they win, and how, is below.

Planning consultancy16 years active6 boroughs85% approval2490th in London
Where they win — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
89
Applications
London 1996–11
Appeal success
fewer than 5 appeals on record for this firm
8 wks
Decision time
median, validation to decision · 78 decided applications
Why a consultant? Listed as a consultant because they appear as the agent on 89 applications and as the applicant on only 18.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your firm?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingDashed line = London average
30%65%100%’96’97’98’99’00’01’02’03’04’05’06’07’08’10’11
What they submit — by scheme type
89decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Policies they argue — and how often it wins[3]

The policies this consultancy leans on most across its applications — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies argued are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy playbook is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this firm submits— subscriber data

How often each named case officer grants consent on this firm's applications. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
16
67%
Show all 6 rows
1
100%

Where this firm's applications concentrate, 1996–11.[1] Click the map above to focus a borough, or a row to open it.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 agreements aren't yet traced to this firm's consents — the borough-by-borough table of contributions secured publishes when the section 106 agreements are ingested. No figure is shown until it's real.
Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
11/P1758
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-08-19
08/16369/FUL
Full Application
Approved
2010-04-26
08/P0676
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-05-07
2007/5203
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2007-11-13
2007/5893
Details (following full perm.)
Withdrawn
2007-11-05
06/P2929
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2007-03-01
06/02808/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-12-21
2006/2528
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2006-10-20
2006/3811
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2006-09-27
2005/3825
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2006-03-29
2005/4141
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2005-12-09
05/P1462
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2005-08-15
05/P1156
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-07-19
2005/1801
Application for Full Permission
Withdrawn
2005-05-13
2005/1344
Application for Full Permission
Withdrawn
2005-04-26
04/3210/F
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-02-02
2004/4856
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2005-01-12
03/P2389
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-10-06
2004/3306
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2004-09-18
04/0053/F
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-03-17
2003/4664
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2004-01-13
03/P0345
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2003-09-19
2003/2329
Application for Full Permission
Refused
2003-09-19
03/1395/F
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-09-17
03/P1070
Outline Planning Permission
Refused
2003-07-18
03/0254/F
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2003-05-30
2003/1286
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2003-05-27
2003/0106
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2003-05-15
02/P1743
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2002-10-18
02/P0208
Outline Planning Permission
Approved
2002-08-22
2002/1400
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2002-08-14
2002/1589
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2002-06-17
02/P0886
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2002-06-10
2001/1591
Outline
Approved
2002-02-20
2001/2011
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2001-11-21
2001/1247
Application for Full Permission
Refused
2001-10-19
2001/3287
Outline
Approved
2001-10-18
01/P1892
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2001-10-04
DC/01/048636/X
Outline Planning Permission
Approved
2001-07-10
2001/0781
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2001-05-25
2000/3577
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2000-12-18
2000/4112
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2000-12-15
2000/4097
Alter or Extend a Listed Building
2000-11-23
00/P1298
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-10-19
99/P0224
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-08-24
2000/2405
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2000-07-27
W/99/0567
Alter or Extend a Listed Building
Approved
2000-04-01
DC/99/044947/X
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-10-11
S/99/0063
Application for Full Permission
Approved
1999-06-22
S/98/0639
Outline
Withdrawn
1999-06-11
S/98/0630
Outline
Withdrawn
1999-06-11
S/99/0239
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
1999-05-18
C/98/0750
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
1999-03-08
S/98/0669
Outline
Approved
1999-02-22
S/98/0511
Application for Full Permission
Withdrawn
1999-01-28
S/98/0604
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
1999-01-12
W/97/0700
Application for Full Permission
Approved
1998-12-18
11/P1758
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-08-19
08/16369/FUL
Full Application
Approved
2010-04-26
08/P0676
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-05-07
Show all 60 rows
2007/5203
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2007-11-13
2007/5893
Details (following full perm.)
Withdrawn
2007-11-05
06/P2929
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2007-03-01
06/02808/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-12-21
2006/2528
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2006-10-20
2006/3811
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2006-09-27
2005/3825
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2006-03-29
2005/4141
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2005-12-09
05/P1462
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2005-08-15
05/P1156
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-07-19
2005/1801
Application for Full Permission
Withdrawn
2005-05-13
2005/1344
Application for Full Permission
Withdrawn
2005-04-26
04/3210/F
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-02-02
2004/4856
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2005-01-12
03/P2389
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-10-06
2004/3306
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2004-09-18
04/0053/F
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-03-17
2003/4664
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2004-01-13
03/P0345
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2003-09-19
2003/2329
Application for Full Permission
Refused
2003-09-19
03/1395/F
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-09-17
03/P1070
Outline Planning Permission
Refused
2003-07-18
03/0254/F
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2003-05-30
2003/1286
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2003-05-27
2003/0106
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2003-05-15
02/P1743
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2002-10-18
02/P0208
Outline Planning Permission
Approved
2002-08-22
2002/1400
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2002-08-14
2002/1589
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2002-06-17
02/P0886
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2002-06-10
2001/1591
Outline
Approved
2002-02-20
2001/2011
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2001-11-21
2001/1247
Application for Full Permission
Refused
2001-10-19
2001/3287
Outline
Approved
2001-10-18
01/P1892
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2001-10-04
DC/01/048636/X
Outline Planning Permission
Approved
2001-07-10
2001/0781
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2001-05-25
2000/3577
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2000-12-18
2000/4112
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2000-12-15
2000/4097
Alter or Extend a Listed Building
2000-11-23
00/P1298
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-10-19
99/P0224
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-08-24
2000/2405
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2000-07-27
W/99/0567
Alter or Extend a Listed Building
Approved
2000-04-01
DC/99/044947/X
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-10-11
S/99/0063
Application for Full Permission
Approved
1999-06-22
S/98/0639
Outline
Withdrawn
1999-06-11
S/98/0630
Outline
Withdrawn
1999-06-11
S/99/0239
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
1999-05-18
C/98/0750
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
1999-03-08
S/98/0669
Outline
Approved
1999-02-22
S/98/0511
Application for Full Permission
Withdrawn
1999-01-28
S/98/0604
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
1999-01-12
W/97/0700
Application for Full Permission
Approved
1998-12-18
Developers they act for— subscriber data
At a glance
FirmThe Hards Partnership
TypePlanning consultancy
Coverage6 London boroughs
Years active16 (1996–11)
Applications89
Approval rate85%
London avg79%
London rank2490th of 46,134
Related investigations
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
How every consultancy ranks →
Approval rate and scheme mix across London consultancies — the full track record.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate and borough breakdown — the London planning applications on which this firm is the named agent, from borough planning registers and published decision notices, 1996–11. The consultant is the COMPANY (a firm filing under several individuals is merged to the firm). "Named agent" means whoever submitted the application to the council — where a separate agent files on behalf of the actual architect or designer, that design credit isn't captured here; this reflects who submitted, not necessarily who designed. Approval rate = approved ÷ (approved + refused), substantive decisions only. · methodology
  2. [2]Case-officer and developer pairings — the named case officer and applicant company on each of this firm’s register records, joined to their own live profiles. Pairing patterns, not endorsements. · methodology
  3. [3]Policies argued are coded from each officer report and decision notice against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — publishes with decision-notice ingestion. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.