Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersTravis Perkins Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopersTravis Perkins Plc
Developer · London

Travis Perkins Plc.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 14 applications in 12 boroughs, seeking 2 residential units, at a 79% approval rate, 2003–22.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer2 units sought12 boroughs79% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
Headline figures count substantive applications only — full, householder and listed building. 24 further procedural applications (S73 variations, condition discharges, prior approvals, certificates, trees, adverts) are on the record: toggle All to include them.
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
14
Applications
London 2003–22
0
Refusals overturned
no refusal has been overturned at appeal
Why is Travis Perkins Plc listed as a developer?It is recorded as the applicant bringing forward 14 applications.
Record component
Applications
Approval rate
Basis
Travis Perkins Limited
8
75%
Primary organisation name recorded as the applicant
Travis Perkins Plc
6
83%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
Total
14
79%
Each application counted once across all components
Travis Perkins Limited
8
75%
Primary organisation name recorded as the applicant
Travis Perkins Plc
6
83%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
Total
14
79%
Each application counted once across all components
Recorded on council registers as: Travis Perkins Plc” (17) · Travis Perkins PLC” (7) · Travis Perkins Ltd” (6) · Travis Perkins Limited” (4) · Travis Perkins (Limited)” (2) · Travis Perkins plc” (2)
Possible matches that cannot be tied to this checked identity are excluded rather than guessed.
Is this your organisation? Claim it — free →Add your logo, contact details and project photos, and correct your record — free.
Something not right?
Worked on an application here but didn't submit it? Team credits — architects and project teams shown on schemes they worked on — are coming. Claim your profile and we'll tell you when it's live.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
0%50%100%’03’04’05’06’07’10’11’12’14’15’16’17’22
What they build — by scheme type
31decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
8
8 approved · 0 refused
6
2 approved · 4 refused
5
4 approved · 1 refused
4
4 approved · 0 refused
3
3 approved · 0 refused
2
1 approved · 1 refused
2
2 approved · 0 refused
2
2 approved · 0 refused
2
1 approved · 1 refused
2
2 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
0 approved · 1 refused
8
8 approved · 0 refused
6
2 approved · 4 refused
5
4 approved · 1 refused
Show all 12 rows
4
4 approved · 0 refused
3
3 approved · 0 refused
2
1 approved · 1 refused
2
2 approved · 0 refused
2
2 approved · 0 refused
2
1 approved · 1 refused
2
2 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
0 approved · 1 refused

Where this developer builds, 2003–22.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2022-07-06
Enfield
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2017-01-18
Bexley
Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2016-06-22
Sutton
Condition Clearing
Approved
2016-03-03
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Refused
2015-10-08
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Refused
2015-08-12
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Approved
2015-08-10
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Refused
2015-06-08
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Refused
2015-06-08
Sutton
Condition Clearing
Approved
2015-02-23
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2014-07-25
Greenwich
Lawfull Use (use)
Approved
2014-01-16
Sutton
Full Application
Refused
2012-08-08
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-05-31
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-05-31
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-05-23
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-05-23
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-05-22
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-05-14
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-05-14
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-04-30
Islington
Full Planning Application
Refused
2011-11-14
Camden
Request for Observations to Adjoining Borough
No objection
2011-06-20
Kingston Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2011-05-25
Harrow
Prior Approval (Miscellaneous Acts)
Approved
2010-05-13
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2010-02-11
Kingston Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2007-09-18
Sutton
Advert Application
Approved
2006-11-14
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2005-10-21
Westminster
Listed Building Consent Application
Approved
2005-10-21
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2004-12-14
Sutton
Full Application
Approved
2003-03-26
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2003-02-03
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2022-07-06
Enfield
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2017-01-18
Show all 38 rows
Bexley
Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2016-06-22
Sutton
Condition Clearing
Approved
2016-03-03
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Refused
2015-10-08
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Refused
2015-08-12
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Approved
2015-08-10
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Refused
2015-06-08
Enfield
Discharge Condition
Refused
2015-06-08
Sutton
Condition Clearing
Approved
2015-02-23
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2014-07-25
Greenwich
Lawfull Use (use)
Approved
2014-01-16
Sutton
Full Application
Refused
2012-08-08
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-05-31
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-05-31
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-05-23
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-05-23
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-05-22
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-05-14
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-05-14
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-04-30
Islington
Full Planning Application
Refused
2011-11-14
Camden
Request for Observations to Adjoining Borough
No objection
2011-06-20
Kingston Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2011-05-25
Harrow
Prior Approval (Miscellaneous Acts)
Approved
2010-05-13
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2010-02-11
Kingston Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2007-09-18
Sutton
Advert Application
Approved
2006-11-14
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2005-10-21
Westminster
Listed Building Consent Application
Approved
2005-10-21
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2004-12-14
Sutton
Full Application
Approved
2003-03-26
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2003-02-03
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperTravis Perkins Plc
Coverage12 London boroughs
Applications14 (2003–22)
Units sought2
Approval rate79%
London rank#4062 of 14,955
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.