Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersVertical Properties Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopersVertical Properties Ltd
Developer · London

Vertical Properties Ltd.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 10 applications in 1 borough, at a 67% approval rate, 2003–06.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer1 borough67% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
10
Applications
London 2003–06
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
0%50%100%’03’05’06
What they build — by scheme type
10decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
10
67%
10
67%

Where this developer builds, 2003–06.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Barnet
Full Application
Approved
2006-11-14
Barnet
Full Application
Approved
2005-07-27
Barnet
Full Application
Approved
2005-04-07
Barnet
Conservation Area Consent
Approved
2005-04-07
Barnet
Full Application
Withdrawn
2004-10-12
Barnet
Conservation Area Consent
Withdrawn
2004-10-12
Barnet
Conservation Area Consent
Withdrawn
2004-04-15
Barnet
Full Application
Withdrawn
2004-04-15
Barnet
Full Application
Refused
2003-10-29
Barnet
Conservation Area Consent
Refused
2003-10-29
Barnet
Full Application
Approved
2006-11-14
Barnet
Full Application
Approved
2005-07-27
Barnet
Full Application
Approved
2005-04-07
Show all 10 rows
Barnet
Conservation Area Consent
Approved
2005-04-07
Barnet
Full Application
Withdrawn
2004-10-12
Barnet
Conservation Area Consent
Withdrawn
2004-10-12
Barnet
Conservation Area Consent
Withdrawn
2004-04-15
Barnet
Full Application
Withdrawn
2004-04-15
Barnet
Full Application
Refused
2003-10-29
Barnet
Conservation Area Consent
Refused
2003-10-29
Consultants they instruct

No named planning agents on this developer's applications.

At a glance
DeveloperVertical Properties Ltd
Coverage1 London borough
Applications10 (2003–06)
Units sought
Approval rate67%
London rank#5991 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.