Developer · London
Whitbread Plc.
A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 76 applications in 23 boroughs, at a 83% approval rate, 1996–26.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.
Developer23 boroughs83% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →76
Applications
London 1996–26
—
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
What they build — by scheme type
Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.
Their planning record — policies in play
The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.
Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits
How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.
The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
Show all 23 rows
Where this developer builds, 1996–26.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.
Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2025-10-31
Merton
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2019-09-06
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2018-11-05
Merton
Non-Material Amendment - Section 96A
Approved
2018-06-28
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2017-07-03
Islington
Non-Material Amendment
Approved
2017-01-17
Richmond Upon Thames
Application to Display Adverts
Approved
2016-09-20
Kingston Upon Thames
Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2016-08-23
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-07-07
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-07-07
Kingston Upon Thames
Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2015-12-14
Kingston Upon Thames
Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2015-12-02
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-08-27
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-06-30
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-06-24
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-04-14
Islington
Non-Material Amendment
Approved
2014-11-26
Islington
Non-Material Amendment
Approved
2014-09-30
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2014-06-27
Waltham Forest
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2014-02-20
Richmond Upon Thames
Application to Display Adverts
Refused
2013-07-31
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Approved
2012-10-31
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Approved
2012-08-03
Richmond Upon Thames
Application to Display Adverts
Refused
2011-08-23
Lambeth
Listed Building Consent
Refused
2009-06-03
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2009-06-03
Hammersmith And Fulham
Advertisement
Approved
2007-09-05
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Withdrawn
2007-07-30
Merton
Listed Building Consent - Alt Or Ext
Approved
2007-03-08
Ealing
Full Application
No determination
2006-11-09
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-02-02
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Planning Application
Approved
2005-12-19
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Planning Application
Approved
2005-12-09
Islington
Advertisement Consent
Other
2005-06-06
Hammersmith And Fulham
Advertisement
Approved
2005-02-18
Enfield
Advertisement Consent
Withdrawn
2004-12-23
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-12-13
Merton
Listed Building Consent - Alt Or Ext
Approved
2004-12-13
Bexley
Listed Building Consent Application
Approved
2004-09-14
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2004-06-10
Lambeth
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2004-01-15
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2003-08-27
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Withdrawn
2003-07-09
Enfield
Full
Withdrawn
2003-06-27
Brent
Observations-Other Boroughs Applications
Withdrawn
2003-02-18
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2025-10-31
Show all 60 rows
Merton
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2019-09-06
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2018-11-05
Merton
Non-Material Amendment - Section 96A
Approved
2018-06-28
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2017-07-03
Islington
Non-Material Amendment
Approved
2017-01-17
Richmond Upon Thames
Application to Display Adverts
Approved
2016-09-20
Kingston Upon Thames
Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2016-08-23
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-07-07
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-07-07
Kingston Upon Thames
Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2015-12-14
Kingston Upon Thames
Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2015-12-02
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-08-27
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-06-30
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-06-24
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-04-14
Islington
Non-Material Amendment
Approved
2014-11-26
Islington
Non-Material Amendment
Approved
2014-09-30
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2014-06-27
Waltham Forest
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2014-02-20
Richmond Upon Thames
Application to Display Adverts
Refused
2013-07-31
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Approved
2012-10-31
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Approved
2012-08-03
Richmond Upon Thames
Application to Display Adverts
Refused
2011-08-23
Lambeth
Listed Building Consent
Refused
2009-06-03
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2009-06-03
Hammersmith And Fulham
Advertisement
Approved
2007-09-05
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Withdrawn
2007-07-30
Merton
Listed Building Consent - Alt Or Ext
Approved
2007-03-08
Ealing
Full Application
No determination
2006-11-09
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-02-02
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Planning Application
Approved
2005-12-19
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Planning Application
Approved
2005-12-09
Islington
Advertisement Consent
Other
2005-06-06
Hammersmith And Fulham
Advertisement
Approved
2005-02-18
Enfield
Advertisement Consent
Withdrawn
2004-12-23
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-12-13
Merton
Listed Building Consent - Alt Or Ext
Approved
2004-12-13
Bexley
Listed Building Consent Application
Approved
2004-09-14
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2004-06-10
Lambeth
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2004-01-15
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2003-08-27
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Withdrawn
2003-07-09
Enfield
Full
Withdrawn
2003-06-27
Brent
Observations-Other Boroughs Applications
Withdrawn
2003-02-18
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperWhitbread Plc
Coverage23 London boroughs
Applications76 (1996–26)
Units sought—
Approval rate83%
London rank#4807 of 16,342
Who decides here
Related investigations
Sources & method
- [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
- [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.