Planning application · Ealing
222127FUL.
45 Disraeli Road Ealing W5 5HS
Full / Other Planning at 45 Disraeli Road Ealing W5 5HS, received 17 May 2022 — refused on 17 Aug 2023.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Aug 2023
65 wks
Decision time
57 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
21
Documents
21 linked
2
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Construction of part single and part two storey, two bedroom dwellinghouse attached to No. 45 Disraeli Road (following demolition of existing lean-to structure); provision of associated amenity space and landscaping
Reference
222127FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
W5 5HS
Ward
Council
Received
17 May 2022
Target date
11 Jul 2022
Decision date
17 Aug 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
222127FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
W5 5HS
Ward
Council
Received
17 May 2022
Target date
11 Jul 2022
Decision date
17 Aug 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 17 Aug 2023 — 65 weeks from submission (57 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
17 May 2022
Application received
11 Jul 2022
Statutory target date
17 Aug 2023
Delegated decision: Refused
17 May 2022
Application received
11 Jul 2022
Statutory target date
17 Aug 2023
Delegated decision: Refused
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its design, scale and bulk represent an
incongruous and excessive development to the original modest dwelling which is out
of keeping with the building pattern in the surrounding area and to the detriment of
the residential amenity to NO.43 Disraeli Road. The proposal would therefore be
contrary the policies of the National Planning Policy Framework, polices D3 and D4 of
the London Plan (2021) and policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing's Adopted DPD (2013).
2
The proposed development would therefore fail to achieve a minimum ceiling
height of 2.5m for at least 75 per cent of the gross internal area and the ground floor
bedroom would be provided with inadequate levels of sunlight and outlook, would
cumulatively result in a substandard form of residential accommodation, to the
detriment of the living conditions of future residents. The proposal would accordingly
fail to comply with Policy D6 of the London Plan and Policy 7B of the Ealing
Development Management DPD.
1
The proposed development, by reason of its design, scale and bulk represent an
incongruous and excessive development to the original modest dwelling which is out
of keeping with the building pattern in the surrounding area and to the detriment of
the residential amenity to NO.43 Disraeli Road. The proposal would therefore be
contrary the policies of the National Planning Policy Framework, polices D3 and D4 of
the London Plan (2021) and policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing's Adopted DPD (2013).
2
The proposed development would therefore fail to achieve a minimum ceiling
height of 2.5m for at least 75 per cent of the gross internal area and the ground floor
bedroom would be provided with inadequate levels of sunlight and outlook, would
cumulatively result in a substandard form of residential accommodation, to the
detriment of the living conditions of future residents. The proposal would accordingly
fail to comply with Policy D6 of the London Plan and Policy 7B of the Ealing
Development Management DPD.
Policies cited
D3D4NPPFD6
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.