Planning application · Ealing
224115FUL.
128 The Broadway Southall Middlesex UB1 1QF
Full / Other Planning at 128 The Broadway Southall Middlesex UB1 1QF, received 26 Sep 2022 — refused on 22 Nov 2022 (delegated, Matt Redman).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
22 Nov 2022
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
16
Documents
16 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Part first floor extension, construction of second floor forming three additional flats (5 in total) with commercial unit below, alterations to ground floor entrance
Reference
224115FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB1 1QF
Council
Received
26 Sep 2022
Target date
20 Nov 2022
Decision date
22 Nov 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
224115FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB1 1QF
Council
Received
26 Sep 2022
Target date
20 Nov 2022
Decision date
22 Nov 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 22 Nov 2022, delegated decision by Matt Redman — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
26 Sep 2022
Application received
20 Nov 2022
Statutory target date
22 Nov 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Matt Redman
26 Sep 2022
Application received
20 Nov 2022
Statutory target date
22 Nov 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Matt Redman
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed alterations by virtue of their height, design, siting and location
and relationship with the surrounding properties would be out of character and
harmful to the established pattern of development in the area, and its character and
appearance. The scheme is therefore considered contrary to the policies of the
National Planning Policy Framework, Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021),
policies 1.1 and 1.2 of the Ealing Development (Core) Strategy and policies 7.4 and
7B Ealing Development Management Development Plan 2013
2
The proposed development has not referenced the impact upon the upper floor
opening to the rear of 126 The Broadway. The proposed changes by virtue of its
height and siting in relation to the upper floor opening to the rear of 126 The
Broadway, could cause a harmful sense of enclosure. As such, the proposal is contrary
to section 7 of the National Planning Policy Framework, policy 7B of the Ealing
Development Management Development Plan 2013, policy 1.1 (g) of the Ealing
Development (Core) Strategy 2012 and policy D6 of the London Plan (2021).
3
The proposed communal amenity space is either of limited proportion or
immediately adjacent a busy road. This would therefore provide an unusable and
inhospitable space and would be contrary to Policy 7D of the Development
Management DPD (2013), policy D6 of the London Plan (2021) and the National
Planning Policy Framework (2021).
4
The siting of the bins and stairs to the rear would be located within an area
shared by cars, vans and other commercial vehicles. This would reduce the width of
the access route and would cause harm to the use of this space. This is therefore
contrary to Policy T4 of the London Plan 2021.
1
The proposed alterations by virtue of their height, design, siting and location
and relationship with the surrounding properties would be out of character and
harmful to the established pattern of development in the area, and its character and
appearance. The scheme is therefore considered contrary to the policies of the
National Planning Policy Framework, Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021),
policies 1.1 and 1.2 of the Ealing Development (Core) Strategy and policies 7.4 and
7B Ealing Development Management Development Plan 2013
2
The proposed development has not referenced the impact upon the upper floor
opening to the rear of 126 The Broadway. The proposed changes by virtue of its
height and siting in relation to the upper floor opening to the rear of 126 The
Broadway, could cause a harmful sense of enclosure. As such, the proposal is contrary
to section 7 of the National Planning Policy Framework, policy 7B of the Ealing
Development Management Development Plan 2013, policy 1.1 (g) of the Ealing
Development (Core) Strategy 2012 and policy D6 of the London Plan (2021).
3
The proposed communal amenity space is either of limited proportion or
immediately adjacent a busy road. This would therefore provide an unusable and
inhospitable space and would be contrary to Policy 7D of the Development
Management DPD (2013), policy D6 of the London Plan (2021) and the National
Planning Policy Framework (2021).
Show all 4 rows
4
The siting of the bins and stairs to the rear would be located within an area
shared by cars, vans and other commercial vehicles. This would reduce the width of
the access route and would cause harm to the use of this space. This is therefore
contrary to Policy T4 of the London Plan 2021.
Policies cited
D3D4NPPFNational Planning Policy Framework 7D6T4
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.