Planning application · Ealing
224370FUL.
1 Waldegrave Road Ealing London W5 3HT
Full / Other Planning at 1 Waldegrave Road Ealing London W5 3HT, received 28 Sep 2022 — refused on 7 Dec 2022 (delegated, Fernanda Calore).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
7 Dec 2022
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Conversion of a dwellinghouse into two self-contained units; installation of two windows to side elevation
Reference
224370FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W5 3HT
Ward
Council
Received
28 Sep 2022
Validated
14 Oct 2022
Target date
8 Dec 2022
Decision date
7 Dec 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
224370FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W5 3HT
Ward
Council
Received
28 Sep 2022
Validated
14 Oct 2022
Target date
8 Dec 2022
Decision date
7 Dec 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 7 Dec 2022, delegated decision by Fernanda Calore — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
28 Sep 2022
Application received
14 Oct 2022
Application validated
8 Dec 2022
Statutory target date
7 Dec 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Fernanda Calore
28 Sep 2022
Application received
14 Oct 2022
Application validated
8 Dec 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
7 Dec 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Fernanda Calore
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed retrospective outbuilding, by reason of inclusion of kitchen
facilities could be used as a separate residential unit. Therefore, it would be out of
character with the prevailing pattern of development to the detriment of the character
of the area and would result in unreasonable impacts into the amenities of
neighbouring occupiers in terms of noise and disturbance. The development would
therefore be contrary to policies 7.4, 7A, 7B and 7D of the Ealing Development
Management DPD (2013), Policies H9, D1, D3, D4, D6 and D14 of the London Plan
(2021), and the National Planning Policy Framework (2021).
2
The proposed ground floor and upper floor flats by reason of the inadequate
access to daylight & sunlight, ventilation to flat A, and lack of garden amenity space
and insufficient total gross internal floor area to flat B, would result in substandard
living conditions, to the detriment of future occupiers. As such, the proposal is
contrary to policies D4 and D6 of the London Plan (2021), policy 7.4 of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013), and National Planning Policy Framework
(2021).
1
The proposed retrospective outbuilding, by reason of inclusion of kitchen
facilities could be used as a separate residential unit. Therefore, it would be out of
character with the prevailing pattern of development to the detriment of the character
of the area and would result in unreasonable impacts into the amenities of
neighbouring occupiers in terms of noise and disturbance. The development would
therefore be contrary to policies 7.4, 7A, 7B and 7D of the Ealing Development
Management DPD (2013), Policies H9, D1, D3, D4, D6 and D14 of the London Plan
(2021), and the National Planning Policy Framework (2021).
2
The proposed ground floor and upper floor flats by reason of the inadequate
access to daylight & sunlight, ventilation to flat A, and lack of garden amenity space
and insufficient total gross internal floor area to flat B, would result in substandard
living conditions, to the detriment of future occupiers. As such, the proposal is
contrary to policies D4 and D6 of the London Plan (2021), policy 7.4 of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013), and National Planning Policy Framework
(2021).
Policies cited
H9D1D3D4D6D14NPPFEaling Development Management DPD 7.4
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.