Planning application · Ealing
224388FUL.
31 Eastcote Lane Northolt Middlesex UB5 5RF
Full / Other Planning at 31 Eastcote Lane Northolt Middlesex UB5 5RF, received 17 Oct 2022 — refused on 9 Dec 2022 (delegated, Fernanda Calore).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
9 Dec 2022
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Continued use of existing outbuilding as a self contained apartment (Retrospective)
Reference
224388FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
UB5 5RF
Council
Received
17 Oct 2022
Target date
11 Dec 2022
Decision date
9 Dec 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
224388FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
UB5 5RF
Council
Received
17 Oct 2022
Target date
11 Dec 2022
Decision date
9 Dec 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 9 Dec 2022, delegated decision by Fernanda Calore — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
17 Oct 2022
Application received
11 Dec 2022
Statutory target date
9 Dec 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Fernanda Calore
17 Oct 2022
Application received
11 Dec 2022
Statutory target date
9 Dec 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Fernanda Calore
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The use of the garden outbuilding as a separate residential dwelling would be
out of character with the prevailing pattern of development to the detriment of the
character of the area and would be detrimental to the amenities of neighbouring
occupiers. The development would therefore be contrary to policies 7.4, 7A, 7B and
7D of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013), Policies H9, D1, D3, D4, D6
and D14 of the London Plan (2021), and the National Planning Policy Framework
(2021).
2
The use of the outbuilding as a separate residential dwelling would provide
substandard living conditions to the detriment of the amenities of future occupiers. As
such, it is contrary to Policy D6 of the London Plan and 7B of the Ealing Development
Management DPD.
1
The use of the garden outbuilding as a separate residential dwelling would be
out of character with the prevailing pattern of development to the detriment of the
character of the area and would be detrimental to the amenities of neighbouring
occupiers. The development would therefore be contrary to policies 7.4, 7A, 7B and
7D of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013), Policies H9, D1, D3, D4, D6
and D14 of the London Plan (2021), and the National Planning Policy Framework
(2021).
2
The use of the outbuilding as a separate residential dwelling would provide
substandard living conditions to the detriment of the amenities of future occupiers. As
such, it is contrary to Policy D6 of the London Plan and 7B of the Ealing Development
Management DPD.
Policies cited
H9D1D3D4D6D14NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.