Planning application · Ealing
224551FUL.
15A Uxbridge Road Hanwell London W7 3PX
Full / Other Planning at 15A Uxbridge Road Hanwell London W7 3PX, received 26 Oct 2022 — refused on 10 Jan 2023.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
10 Jan 2023
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
15
Documents
15 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Conversion of existing ground floor flat into 2 self-contained studio flats and associated external alterations; single storey rear extension.
Reference
224551FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
26 Oct 2022
Target date
20 Dec 2022
Decision date
10 Jan 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Reference
224551FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
26 Oct 2022
Target date
20 Dec 2022
Decision date
10 Jan 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 10 Jan 2023 — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
26 Oct 2022
Application received
20 Dec 2022
Statutory target date
10 Jan 2023
Delegated decision: Refused
26 Oct 2022
Application received
20 Dec 2022
Statutory target date
10 Jan 2023
Delegated decision: Refused
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of design and siting would result in Flat
B and the upper Flat 15 having access to the staircase on the eastern flank of the
property causing loss of privacy for both flats. The proposal fails to provide an
acceptable level of quality of accommodation, to the detriment of the living conditions
of existing and future occupiers of both Flat B and 15. As such, the proposal would be
contrary to policies D6 of the London Plan (2021), policies 3.5, 7B and 7D of the
Ealing Development Management Plan (2013), the National Planning Policy Framework
(2021) and the Draft Ealing Local Plan (2022) (Reg 18).
2
The proposed single storey rear extension, by reason of scale and appearance
would be out of character with the host property and the prevailing pattern of
development contrary to National Planning Policy Framework 2021, London Plan policy
D3, policy 7.4 of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013) and Policy DAA of
Ealing's Local Plan (2022) (Reg.18) and SPD4 (Residential Extensions).
1
The proposed development, by reason of design and siting would result in Flat
B and the upper Flat 15 having access to the staircase on the eastern flank of the
property causing loss of privacy for both flats. The proposal fails to provide an
acceptable level of quality of accommodation, to the detriment of the living conditions
of existing and future occupiers of both Flat B and 15. As such, the proposal would be
contrary to policies D6 of the London Plan (2021), policies 3.5, 7B and 7D of the
Ealing Development Management Plan (2013), the National Planning Policy Framework
(2021) and the Draft Ealing Local Plan (2022) (Reg 18).
2
The proposed single storey rear extension, by reason of scale and appearance
would be out of character with the host property and the prevailing pattern of
development contrary to National Planning Policy Framework 2021, London Plan policy
D3, policy 7.4 of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013) and Policy DAA of
Ealing's Local Plan (2022) (Reg.18) and SPD4 (Residential Extensions).
Policies cited
D6NPPFD3Ealing Development Management DPD 7.4
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.