Planning application · Ealing
224619OUT.
Land Rear Of 1288 Greenford Road Greenford Middlesex UB6 0HH
Full / Other Planning at Land Rear Of 1288 Greenford Road Greenford Middlesex UB6 0HH, received 31 Oct 2022 — refused on 21 Dec 2022.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
21 Dec 2022
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
13
Documents
13 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Construction of a detached building comprising of commercial unit and 3 x one bedroom flats (Outline Planning Application - Details of Access sought only, with Appearance, Landscaping, Layout and Scale matters reserved)
Reference
224619OUT
Type
Outline Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
31 Oct 2022
Target date
25 Dec 2022
Decision date
21 Dec 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Reference
224619OUT
Type
Outline Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
31 Oct 2022
Target date
25 Dec 2022
Decision date
21 Dec 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 21 Dec 2022 — 7 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
31 Oct 2022
Application received
25 Dec 2022
Statutory target date
21 Dec 2022
Delegated decision: Refused
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
31 Oct 2022
Application received
25 Dec 2022
Statutory target date
21 Dec 2022
Delegated decision: Refused
Show all 4 rows
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Due to lack of evidence submitted, the principle of change of use from a
storage yard (Use Class B8) to mixed use of storage (Use Class B8) and residential
(Use Class C3) fails to meet the requirements set out in Policy 4A of the Development
Management Development Plan Document (2013) and Policies E4 and E7 of the
London Plan (2021).
2
The proposal by reason of its vehicle parking layout and access arrangements,
would detriment to highway and pedestrian safety, as a result of:
1) excessive off-street parking;
2) lack of Blue Badge Parking.
As a result, the proposal would be contrary to polices GG2, D1, D3, D4, D6, D11, T2,
T3, T6 and T7 of the London Plan (2021); policies 3.5 and 7.4 of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013); and Section 12 of the NPPF (2021).
3
The proposed residential units by reason of their single aspects and
substandard form of private amenity space provided, would result in substandard
living conditions for prospective occupants, cumulatively result in an insecure and
substandard form of accommodation to the detriment of potential future occupiers of
the residential units. As such, the proposal would be contrary to policies D1, D4, D5,
D6 and D11 of the London Plan (2021), policy 3.5, 7.3, 7B and 7D of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013); and the London Housing SPG (2016).
1
Due to lack of evidence submitted, the principle of change of use from a
storage yard (Use Class B8) to mixed use of storage (Use Class B8) and residential
(Use Class C3) fails to meet the requirements set out in Policy 4A of the Development
Management Development Plan Document (2013) and Policies E4 and E7 of the
London Plan (2021).
2
The proposal by reason of its vehicle parking layout and access arrangements,
would detriment to highway and pedestrian safety, as a result of:
1) excessive off-street parking;
2) lack of Blue Badge Parking.
As a result, the proposal would be contrary to polices GG2, D1, D3, D4, D6, D11, T2,
T3, T6 and T7 of the London Plan (2021); policies 3.5 and 7.4 of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013); and Section 12 of the NPPF (2021).
3
The proposed residential units by reason of their single aspects and
substandard form of private amenity space provided, would result in substandard
living conditions for prospective occupants, cumulatively result in an insecure and
substandard form of accommodation to the detriment of potential future occupiers of
the residential units. As such, the proposal would be contrary to policies D1, D4, D5,
D6 and D11 of the London Plan (2021), policy 3.5, 7.3, 7B and 7D of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013); and the London Housing SPG (2016).
Policies cited
E4E7GG2D1D3D4D6D11T2T3T6T7Ealing Development Management DPD 3.5Ealing Development Management DPD 7.4NPPFD5
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.