Planning application · Ealing
224648FUL.
1A Saxon Road Southall Middlesex UB1 1QG
Full / Other Planning at 1A Saxon Road Southall Middlesex UB1 1QG, received 1 Nov 2022 — refused on 12 Dec 2022 (delegated, John Robertson).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
12 Dec 2022
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
14
Documents
14 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Construction of part two, part 3 storey dwellinghouse incorporating a basement (following demolition of existing garage/store); provision of associated cycle storage and refuse storage facilities
Reference
224648FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB1 1QG
Council
Received
1 Nov 2022
Target date
26 Dec 2022
Decision date
12 Dec 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
224648FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB1 1QG
Council
Received
1 Nov 2022
Target date
26 Dec 2022
Decision date
12 Dec 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 12 Dec 2022, delegated decision by John Robertson — 6 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
1 Nov 2022
Application received
26 Dec 2022
Statutory target date
12 Dec 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · John Robertson
1 Nov 2022
Application received
26 Dec 2022
Statutory target date
12 Dec 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · John Robertson
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed dwelling, by virtue of its height, design, siting and location and
relationship with the surrounding properties, would be out of character and harmful to
the established pattern of development in the area contrary to policy D3 of the
London Plan (2021), policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development Management DPD,
and Section 5 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2021).
2
The proposed development would provide substandard living conditions for
prospective occupiers by virtue of inadequate amenity space, lack of privacy,
disturbance from windows adjoining a service road, poor access and environment
contrary to policies 3.5, 7A, 7B and 7D of the Ealing Development Management DPD
(2013), policies D3 and D6 of the London Plan (2021) and Section 12 of the National
Planning Policy Framework (2021).
3
The proposed development by reason of its design, scale and proximity to
existing dwellings would potentially result in harm to the amenity of neighbouring
residences due to overshadowing and increased sense of enclosure of rear gardens
contrary to policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013),
policy D6 of the London Plan (2021) and the National Planning Policy Framework
(2021).
1
The proposed dwelling, by virtue of its height, design, siting and location and
relationship with the surrounding properties, would be out of character and harmful to
the established pattern of development in the area contrary to policy D3 of the
London Plan (2021), policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development Management DPD,
and Section 5 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2021).
2
The proposed development would provide substandard living conditions for
prospective occupiers by virtue of inadequate amenity space, lack of privacy,
disturbance from windows adjoining a service road, poor access and environment
contrary to policies 3.5, 7A, 7B and 7D of the Ealing Development Management DPD
(2013), policies D3 and D6 of the London Plan (2021) and Section 12 of the National
Planning Policy Framework (2021).
3
The proposed development by reason of its design, scale and proximity to
existing dwellings would potentially result in harm to the amenity of neighbouring
residences due to overshadowing and increased sense of enclosure of rear gardens
contrary to policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013),
policy D6 of the London Plan (2021) and the National Planning Policy Framework
(2021).
Policies cited
D3National Planning Policy Framework 5NPPFD6National Planning Policy Framework 12
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.