Planning application · Ealing
230715FUL.
75 Brunswick Road Ealing W5 1AQ
Full / Other Planning at 75 Brunswick Road Ealing W5 1AQ, received 21 Feb 2023 — refused on 1 Jun 2023 (delegated, Imogen Botterill-Downs).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
1 Jun 2023
14 wks
Decision time
6 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Single storey rear/side extension (following demolition of existing outbuilding)
Reference
230715FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W5 1AQ
Ward
Council
Received
21 Feb 2023
Validated
13 Mar 2023
Target date
7 May 2023
Decision date
1 Jun 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
230715FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W5 1AQ
Ward
Council
Received
21 Feb 2023
Validated
13 Mar 2023
Target date
7 May 2023
Decision date
1 Jun 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 1 Jun 2023, delegated decision by Imogen Botterill-Downs — 14 weeks from submission (6 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
21 Feb 2023
Application received
13 Mar 2023
Application validated
7 May 2023
Statutory target date
1 Jun 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Imogen Botterill-Downs
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
21 Feb 2023
Application received
13 Mar 2023
Application validated
7 May 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
1 Jun 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Imogen Botterill-Downs
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development by reason of the design, appearance, scale and
excessive depth would result in an incongruous addition to the original property to the
detriment of the character of the area. As such, the proposed development would be
contrary to Policy D3, D4 and D6 of the London Plan (2021), Policies 7.4, 7B and 7D
of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013), National Planning Policy
Framework (2021) and Supplementary Planning Document 4 - Residential Extensions.
2
The proposed extension by reason of its design, scale, bulk and siting would
result in an unneighbourly form of development to the detriment of the residential
amenity of No. 77 Brunswick Road, by way of being overbearing and an increased
sense of enclosure contrary to policy D4 of the London Plan (2021) and policies 7.4
and 7B of the Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document (2013).
1
The proposed development by reason of the design, appearance, scale and
excessive depth would result in an incongruous addition to the original property to the
detriment of the character of the area. As such, the proposed development would be
contrary to Policy D3, D4 and D6 of the London Plan (2021), Policies 7.4, 7B and 7D
of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013), National Planning Policy
Framework (2021) and Supplementary Planning Document 4 - Residential Extensions.
2
The proposed extension by reason of its design, scale, bulk and siting would
result in an unneighbourly form of development to the detriment of the residential
amenity of No. 77 Brunswick Road, by way of being overbearing and an increased
sense of enclosure contrary to policy D4 of the London Plan (2021) and policies 7.4
and 7B of the Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document (2013).
Policies cited
D3D4D6NPPF
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.