Planning application · Ealing
230767FUL.
4 Longhook Gardens Northolt UB5 6PE
Full / Other Planning at 4 Longhook Gardens Northolt UB5 6PE, received 27 Feb 2023 — refused on 21 Apr 2023 (delegated, Matt Redman).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
21 Apr 2023
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
9
Documents
9 linked
4
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Single storey detached garden outbuilding to be used as self-contained flat (following demolition of existing outbuilding)
Reference
230767FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB5 6PE
Council
Received
27 Feb 2023
Target date
23 Apr 2023
Decision date
21 Apr 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
230767FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB5 6PE
Council
Received
27 Feb 2023
Target date
23 Apr 2023
Decision date
21 Apr 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 21 Apr 2023, delegated decision by Matt Redman — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
27 Feb 2023
Application received
23 Apr 2023
Statutory target date
21 Apr 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Matt Redman
27 Feb 2023
Application received
23 Apr 2023
Statutory target date
21 Apr 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Matt Redman
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed single storey residential dwelling located at the end of the garden
would have the appearance of an outbuilding but would also be a new residential
dwelling. By virtue of its backland location, form and relationship with its context, it
would be out of character and harmful to the established pattern of development in
the area, and its character and appearance, contrary to the policies of the National
Planning Policy Framework, Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), policies 1.1
and 1.2 of the Ealing Development (Core) Strategy and policies 7.4 and 7B Ealing
Development Management Development Plan 2013.
2
The proposed development, by reason of inadequate GIA would provide
substandard accommodation to the detriment of the living conditions of future
occupiers contrary to policies 3.5, 7B and 7D of the Development Management DPD
(2013), Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), The Technical Housing Standards and
the National Planning Policy Framework (2021).
1
The proposed single storey residential dwelling located at the end of the garden
would have the appearance of an outbuilding but would also be a new residential
dwelling. By virtue of its backland location, form and relationship with its context, it
would be out of character and harmful to the established pattern of development in
the area, and its character and appearance, contrary to the policies of the National
Planning Policy Framework, Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), policies 1.1
and 1.2 of the Ealing Development (Core) Strategy and policies 7.4 and 7B Ealing
Development Management Development Plan 2013.
2
The proposed development, by reason of inadequate GIA would provide
substandard accommodation to the detriment of the living conditions of future
occupiers contrary to policies 3.5, 7B and 7D of the Development Management DPD
(2013), Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), The Technical Housing Standards and
the National Planning Policy Framework (2021).
Policies cited
D3D4NPPFD6
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
4
In support
0
Total comments
4
Objections
4
In support
0
Total comments
4
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.