Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEalingPerivale ward231491HH
Planning application · Ealing

231491HH.

108 Bilton Road Perivale UB6 7BJ

Householder at 108 Bilton Road Perivale UB6 7BJ, received 17 Apr 2023 — refused on 26 Jul 2023 (delegated, Imogen Botterill-Downs).

EalingPerivaleUB6 7BJ231491HH
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
26 Jul 2023
14 wks
Decision time
6 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
1
Objections
1 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Formation of vehicular crossover; external alterations to front driveway

Reference
231491HH
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Postcode
UB6 7BJ
Council
Received
17 Apr 2023
Validated
24 Apr 2023
Target date
18 Jun 2023
Decision date
26 Jul 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
231491HH
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Postcode
UB6 7BJ
Council
Received
17 Apr 2023
Validated
24 Apr 2023
Target date
18 Jun 2023
Decision date
26 Jul 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE
26 Jul 2023
OFFICERS REPORT
26 Jul 2023
NEIGHBOUR SITE NOTICE
25 Apr 2023
PROPOSED PLANS.PDF
25 Apr 2023
EXISTING PLANS.PDF
25 Apr 2023
231491HH SM.PDF
25 Apr 2023
LOCATION PLAN
18 Apr 2023
DECISION NOTICE
26 Jul 2023
OFFICERS REPORT
26 Jul 2023
NEIGHBOUR SITE NOTICE
25 Apr 2023
Show all 7 rows
PROPOSED PLANS.PDF
25 Apr 2023
EXISTING PLANS.PDF
25 Apr 2023
231491HH SM.PDF
25 Apr 2023
LOCATION PLAN
18 Apr 2023

Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 26 Jul 2023, delegated decision by Imogen Botterill-Downs — 14 weeks from submission (6 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
17 Apr 2023
Application received
24 Apr 2023
Application validated
18 Jun 2023
Statutory target date
26 Jul 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Imogen Botterill-Downs
17 Apr 2023
Application received
24 Apr 2023
Application validated
18 Jun 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
26 Jul 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Imogen Botterill-Downs

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed formation of a crossover, by way of its scale, proximity to a nearby street tree and lack of supporting evidence would fail to preserve and ensure the tree's longevity. The construction area of the proposed crossover is at risk of adversely impacting the root spread of the street tree, inadequate information has been submitted regarding its retention and protection. As such, this proposal is contrary to Policy G7 of the London Plan (2021), and Policy 5.10 of the Ealing Development Management DPD 2013.
1
The proposed formation of a crossover, by way of its scale, proximity to a nearby street tree and lack of supporting evidence would fail to preserve and ensure the tree's longevity. The construction area of the proposed crossover is at risk of adversely impacting the root spread of the street tree, inadequate information has been submitted regarding its retention and protection. As such, this proposal is contrary to Policy G7 of the London Plan (2021), and Policy 5.10 of the Ealing Development Management DPD 2013.
Policies cited
G7Ealing Development Management DPD 5.10

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
1
Total comments
2
Objections
1
In support
1
Total comments
2
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.