Planning application · Ealing
233880FUL.
433-439 Uxbridge Road Southall UB1 3EW
Full / Other Planning at 433-439 Uxbridge Road Southall UB1 3EW, received 19 Sep 2023 — refused on 12 Jan 2024 (delegated, Jenny Knox).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
12 Jan 2024
16 wks
Decision time
8 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
27
Documents
27 linked
27
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Construction of a four storey building comprising of commercial use at ground floor level and eight self contained residential units above
Reference
233880FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB1 3EW
Ward
Council
Received
19 Sep 2023
Target date
13 Nov 2023
Decision date
12 Jan 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
233880FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB1 3EW
Ward
Council
Received
19 Sep 2023
Target date
13 Nov 2023
Decision date
12 Jan 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 12 Jan 2024, delegated decision by Jenny Knox — 16 weeks from submission (8 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
19 Sep 2023
Application received
13 Nov 2023
Statutory target date
12 Jan 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jenny Knox
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
19 Sep 2023
Application received
13 Nov 2023
Statutory target date
12 Jan 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jenny Knox
Show all 4 rows
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal by virtue of its design, scale and massing would fail to respond
positively to the surrounding context, the flat roof would remain at odds with and
detract from the surrounding character, in terms of scale and pattern of development,
and impacts to the street scene and character. The proposal is not considered
acceptable or consistent with policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021) and policy
7.4 of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013).
2
The proposed development would lead to detrimental impacts upon the living
conditions of the occupants of No 1 Wharncliffe Drive, having particular regard to
daylight and sunlight contrary to Core Strategy policies 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1, DPD Policies
7A and 7B and London Plan Policies D3 and D6.
3
The proposal would not provide adequate living conditions for the intended
future occupiers of the scheme, with particular reference to the provision of private
and communal outdoor space. There is no provision of communal space and the
balconies are undersized and enclosed, making them not fit for purpose. In this
respect, it would conflict with Policies 3.5, 7B and 7D of the Ealing DPD (2013),
policies 1.1 and 1.2 of Ealing Core Strategy (2012) and policy D6 of the London Plan
(2021).
4
The proposed development fails to demonstrate adequate provision for inclusive
and accessible accommodation in reference to wheelchair accessible or adaptable
units. The development therefore fails to comply with policies D7 and H2 of the
London Plan (2021).
5
The proposal fails to include a blue badge parking bay and in the absence of a
feasible means of securing the development as car-free, the development would place
undue stress on the parking environment through the additional demand from the
development. This would likely result in inconsiderate parking that would unacceptably
increase the risk of conflict between vehicles and pedestrians. This would not accord
with the sustainable travel and parking management requirements of policies T4 and
T6 of the London Plan (2021).
1
The proposal by virtue of its design, scale and massing would fail to respond
positively to the surrounding context, the flat roof would remain at odds with and
detract from the surrounding character, in terms of scale and pattern of development,
and impacts to the street scene and character. The proposal is not considered
acceptable or consistent with policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021) and policy
7.4 of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013).
2
The proposed development would lead to detrimental impacts upon the living
conditions of the occupants of No 1 Wharncliffe Drive, having particular regard to
daylight and sunlight contrary to Core Strategy policies 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1, DPD Policies
7A and 7B and London Plan Policies D3 and D6.
3
The proposal would not provide adequate living conditions for the intended
future occupiers of the scheme, with particular reference to the provision of private
and communal outdoor space. There is no provision of communal space and the
balconies are undersized and enclosed, making them not fit for purpose. In this
respect, it would conflict with Policies 3.5, 7B and 7D of the Ealing DPD (2013),
policies 1.1 and 1.2 of Ealing Core Strategy (2012) and policy D6 of the London Plan
(2021).
Show all 5 rows
4
The proposed development fails to demonstrate adequate provision for inclusive
and accessible accommodation in reference to wheelchair accessible or adaptable
units. The development therefore fails to comply with policies D7 and H2 of the
London Plan (2021).
5
The proposal fails to include a blue badge parking bay and in the absence of a
feasible means of securing the development as car-free, the development would place
undue stress on the parking environment through the additional demand from the
development. This would likely result in inconsiderate parking that would unacceptably
increase the risk of conflict between vehicles and pedestrians. This would not accord
with the sustainable travel and parking management requirements of policies T4 and
T6 of the London Plan (2021).
Policies cited
D3D4Ealing Development Management DPD 7.4D6Ealing Core Strategy 1.1Ealing Core Strategy 1.2D7H2T4T6
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
27
In support
0
Total comments
27
Objections
27
In support
0
Total comments
27
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.