Planning application · Ealing
234003FUL.
23A Aintree Road Perivale UB6 7LA
Full / Other Planning at 23A Aintree Road Perivale UB6 7LA, received 2 Oct 2023 — refused on 29 Jan 2024.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
29 Jan 2024
17 wks
Decision time
9 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
15
Documents
15 linked
7
Objections
12 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Change of use of ground floor from warehouse (Use Class B8) to caf� (Use Class E)
Reference
234003FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
UB6 7LA
Ward
Council
Received
2 Oct 2023
Validated
5 Dec 2023
Target date
29 Jan 2024
Decision date
29 Jan 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
234003FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
UB6 7LA
Ward
Council
Received
2 Oct 2023
Validated
5 Dec 2023
Target date
29 Jan 2024
Decision date
29 Jan 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 29 Jan 2024 — 17 weeks from submission (9 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
2 Oct 2023
Application received
5 Dec 2023
Application validated
29 Jan 2024
Statutory target date
29 Jan 2024
Delegated decision: Refused
2 Oct 2023
Application received
5 Dec 2023
Application validated
29 Jan 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
29 Jan 2024
Delegated decision: Refused
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed use of part of the ground floor the premises as a café would
result in an inappropriate, non-conforming use that would compromise the integrity
and effectiveness of the Locally Strategic Industrial Location, conflicting with the aims
and objectives of policies E4 and E5 of the London Plan (2021) and policy 1.1(c) of the
Ealing Development (Core) Strategy 2026.
2
The existing external alterations of the property was made without planning
permission and subjected to a planning enforcement notice, by reason of its design,
appearance and materials, has a detrimental effect on the character and appearance
of the host property, adjacent industrial building and wider Strategic Industrial
Location, contrary to Policies D1, D2, E4 and E5 of the London Plan (2021), Policies
7.4 and 7B of Ealing's Adopted Development Management Development Plan
Document, 2013 and Policies 1.1(c) and 3.2 of the Development Strategy.
1
The proposed use of part of the ground floor the premises as a café would
result in an inappropriate, non-conforming use that would compromise the integrity
and effectiveness of the Locally Strategic Industrial Location, conflicting with the aims
and objectives of policies E4 and E5 of the London Plan (2021) and policy 1.1(c) of the
Ealing Development (Core) Strategy 2026.
2
The existing external alterations of the property was made without planning
permission and subjected to a planning enforcement notice, by reason of its design,
appearance and materials, has a detrimental effect on the character and appearance
of the host property, adjacent industrial building and wider Strategic Industrial
Location, contrary to Policies D1, D2, E4 and E5 of the London Plan (2021), Policies
7.4 and 7B of Ealing's Adopted Development Management Development Plan
Document, 2013 and Policies 1.1(c) and 3.2 of the Development Strategy.
Policies cited
E4E5D1D2Development Strategy 3.2
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
7
In support
12
Total comments
20
Objections
7
In support
12
Total comments
20
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.