Planning application · Ealing
241127FUL.
Rear Of 31 Corfton Road Ealing W5 2HP
Full / Other Planning at Rear Of 31 Corfton Road Ealing W5 2HP, received 18 Mar 2024 — refused on 29 Apr 2024 (delegated, Patrick Franklin).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
29 Apr 2024
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
13
Documents
13 linked
3
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Construction of a detached single storey dwelling house over basement and ground floor level
Reference
241127FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W5 2HP
Ward
Council
Received
18 Mar 2024
Target date
13 May 2024
Decision date
29 Apr 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
241127FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W5 2HP
Ward
Council
Received
18 Mar 2024
Target date
13 May 2024
Decision date
29 Apr 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 29 Apr 2024, delegated decision by Patrick Franklin — 6 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
18 Mar 2024
Application received
13 May 2024
Statutory target date
29 Apr 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Patrick Franklin
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
18 Mar 2024
Application received
13 May 2024
Statutory target date
29 Apr 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Patrick Franklin
Show all 4 rows
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, due to its location in the original rear garden of
Number 31 Corfton Road and due to its size, would represent a significant change to
the open, natural and quiet nature of the land at the rear of 31 Crofton Road. As such,
the development would not preserve the character of the conservation area and would
not meet the statutory tests in the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas)
Act 1990. The development would not comply with the NPPF (2023), Policies D3, D4
and HC1 of the London Plan (2021), Policies 7.4, 7B and 7C of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013) and Policy DAA of the Ealing Local Plan (Reg
19) (2024).
2
The proposed development, due to its raised patio area, has the potential to
erode the amenities of surrounding and existing residential properties. Furthermore,
the proposed development does not clearly illustrate the raised patio on the technical
drawings and fails to provide visual clarity about the design of the development. The
proposal would not comply with the NPPF (2023), Policy 7B of the Ealing Development
Management DPD (2013) and Policy DAA of the Ealing Local Plan (Reg 19) (2024).
3
The proposed development, by reason of the dwelling's single eastern aspect,
poor outlook, lack of natural daylight and sunlight, and poor ventilation, would result
in an unsatisfactory standard of accommodation for future occupants. The proposal
fails to comply with Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), Policy 3.5 of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013), the London Plan Housing SPG (2016) and the
London Plan Guidance Housing Design Standards (2023).
1
The proposed development, due to its location in the original rear garden of
Number 31 Corfton Road and due to its size, would represent a significant change to
the open, natural and quiet nature of the land at the rear of 31 Crofton Road. As such,
the development would not preserve the character of the conservation area and would
not meet the statutory tests in the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas)
Act 1990. The development would not comply with the NPPF (2023), Policies D3, D4
and HC1 of the London Plan (2021), Policies 7.4, 7B and 7C of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013) and Policy DAA of the Ealing Local Plan (Reg
19) (2024).
2
The proposed development, due to its raised patio area, has the potential to
erode the amenities of surrounding and existing residential properties. Furthermore,
the proposed development does not clearly illustrate the raised patio on the technical
drawings and fails to provide visual clarity about the design of the development. The
proposal would not comply with the NPPF (2023), Policy 7B of the Ealing Development
Management DPD (2013) and Policy DAA of the Ealing Local Plan (Reg 19) (2024).
3
The proposed development, by reason of the dwelling's single eastern aspect,
poor outlook, lack of natural daylight and sunlight, and poor ventilation, would result
in an unsatisfactory standard of accommodation for future occupants. The proposal
fails to comply with Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), Policy 3.5 of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013), the London Plan Housing SPG (2016) and the
London Plan Guidance Housing Design Standards (2023).
Policies cited
D3D4HC1NPPFD6Ealing Development Management DPD 3.5
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
3
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
3
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.