Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Ealing›…Ealing Common wardW5 5LG86 The Grove Ealing W5 5LG›241486FUL
Planning application · Ealing

241486FUL.

86 The Grove Ealing W5 5LG

Full / Other Planning at 86 The Grove Ealing W5 5LG, received 17 Apr 2024 — refused on 7 Jun 2024.

Ealing›Ealing Common›W5 5LG›241486FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
7 Jun 2024
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
8
Documents
8 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Conversion of existing 2 flats into 1 self-contained residential unit; excavation to lower the lower ground floor; excavation to provide a lower ground floor rear extension and courtyard; single storey rear extension to the upper ground floor; replacement of windows

Reference
241486FUL
Type
Full Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
17 Apr 2024
Target date
12 Jun 2024
Decision date
7 Jun 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Reference
241486FUL
Type
Full Application
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
17 Apr 2024
Target date
12 Jun 2024
Decision date
7 Jun 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
OFFICERS REPORT
7 Jun 2024
DECISION NOTICE
7 Jun 2024
CONSERVATION SITE NOTICE
1 May 2024
SITE NOTICE
1 May 2024
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
17 Apr 2024
(MULTIPLE PLANS)24-003 - EXISTING DRAWINGS
17 Apr 2024
(MULTIPLE PLANS)24-003 - PROPOSED DRAWINGS
17 Apr 2024
(DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT)24-003 - PLANNING DESIGN AND AC
17 Apr 2024
OFFICERS REPORT
7 Jun 2024
DECISION NOTICE
7 Jun 2024
CONSERVATION SITE NOTICE
1 May 2024
Show all 8 rows
SITE NOTICE
1 May 2024
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
17 Apr 2024
(MULTIPLE PLANS)24-003 - EXISTING DRAWINGS
17 Apr 2024
(MULTIPLE PLANS)24-003 - PROPOSED DRAWINGS
17 Apr 2024
(DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT)24-003 - PLANNING DESIGN AND AC
17 Apr 2024

Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 7 Jun 2024 — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
17 Apr 2024
Application received
12 Jun 2024
Statutory target date
7 Jun 2024
Delegated decision: Refused
17 Apr 2024
Application received
12 Jun 2024
Statutory target date
7 Jun 2024
Delegated decision: Refused

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed rear extension, by reason of its overly tall height and contemporary and unsympathetic upper ground level fenestration in terms of design, scale, and materiality, would not conserve the significance of the heritage asset and conservation area and not respect the form, experience, quality, context, and character of the area. No clear and convincing justification and no public benefit is provided. As such, the proposal would not satisfy The London Plan (2021) policies HC1, D1, D3, D4, Development Management: Development Plan Document (2013) policies 7C and 7.4, and the test in Chapter 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework.
1
The proposed rear extension, by reason of its overly tall height and contemporary and unsympathetic upper ground level fenestration in terms of design, scale, and materiality, would not conserve the significance of the heritage asset and conservation area and not respect the form, experience, quality, context, and character of the area. No clear and convincing justification and no public benefit is provided. As such, the proposal would not satisfy The London Plan (2021) policies HC1, D1, D3, D4, Development Management: Development Plan Document (2013) policies 7C and 7.4, and the test in Chapter 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework.
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 16NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.