Planning application · Ealing
241841FUL.
Flat 3, 64A Southfield Road Chiswick W4 1BD
Full / Other Planning at Flat 3, 64A Southfield Road Chiswick W4 1BD, received 12 Jan 2024 — refused on 3 Jul 2024 (delegated, Cathy Munonyedi).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
3 Jul 2024
25 wks
Decision time
17 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
19
Documents
19 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Rear outrigger roof extension
Reference
241841FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W4 1BD
Ward
Council
Received
12 Jan 2024
Validated
9 May 2024
Target date
4 Jul 2024
Decision date
3 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
241841FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W4 1BD
Ward
Council
Received
12 Jan 2024
Validated
9 May 2024
Target date
4 Jul 2024
Decision date
3 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 3 Jul 2024, delegated decision by Cathy Munonyedi — 25 weeks from submission (17 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
12 Jan 2024
Application received
9 May 2024
Application validated
4 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
3 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Cathy Munonyedi
12 Jan 2024
Application received
9 May 2024
Application validated
4 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
3 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Cathy Munonyedi
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed duplex, by reason of its lack of an appropriately sized double
bedroom, and lack of adequate internal floor area, would provide a substandard
form of residential accommodation, to the detriment of the amenities of future
occupants. As such, the proposal is contrary to Policy 3.5 of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013), Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), the
London Plan guidance Housing Design Standards (2023) and the Technical
Housing Standards - Nationally Described Space Standards (2015).
2
The proposed roof extension, by reason of its scale, mass, bulk, design and
siting, would result in a development which over-dominates and is unsympathetic
to the building's original scale and character, to detriment of the character and
appearance of the host residential property and local area. As such, the proposal
is contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework 2023(Update) - section 12,
Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013), Policy DAA of Ealing's Local Plan
(Reg.19) and Ealing's Housing Design Guidance 2022.
3
The proposed roof extension, by reason of its scale, mass, bulk, design and
siting, would result in an overbearing and unneighbourly form of development,
that would create an increased sense of enclosure, loss of light and outlook and
harm the visual amenities of Nos. 62 Southfield Road, Flat 2, First floor, 64
Southfield Road and Flat 4, 64 Southfield Road (second floor)(application
property). As such, the proposal is contrary to National Planning Policy
Framework 2023(Update) - section 12, Policy 7B of the Ealing Development
Management DPD (2013) and Policy DAA of Ealing's Local Plan (Reg. 19).
1
The proposed duplex, by reason of its lack of an appropriately sized double
bedroom, and lack of adequate internal floor area, would provide a substandard
form of residential accommodation, to the detriment of the amenities of future
occupants. As such, the proposal is contrary to Policy 3.5 of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013), Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), the
London Plan guidance Housing Design Standards (2023) and the Technical
Housing Standards - Nationally Described Space Standards (2015).
2
The proposed roof extension, by reason of its scale, mass, bulk, design and
siting, would result in a development which over-dominates and is unsympathetic
to the building's original scale and character, to detriment of the character and
appearance of the host residential property and local area. As such, the proposal
is contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework 2023(Update) - section 12,
Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013), Policy DAA of Ealing's Local Plan
(Reg.19) and Ealing's Housing Design Guidance 2022.
3
The proposed roof extension, by reason of its scale, mass, bulk, design and
siting, would result in an overbearing and unneighbourly form of development,
that would create an increased sense of enclosure, loss of light and outlook and
harm the visual amenities of Nos. 62 Southfield Road, Flat 2, First floor, 64
Southfield Road and Flat 4, 64 Southfield Road (second floor)(application
property). As such, the proposal is contrary to National Planning Policy
Framework 2023(Update) - section 12, Policy 7B of the Ealing Development
Management DPD (2013) and Policy DAA of Ealing's Local Plan (Reg. 19).
Policies cited
Ealing Development Management DPD 3.5D6D3D4NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.