Planning application · Ealing
242027FUL.
Gillingas House 5 Drayton Green Road West Ealing W13 0NG
Full / Other Planning at Gillingas House 5 Drayton Green Road West Ealing W13 0NG, received 28 May 2024 — refused on 3 Sep 2024.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
3 Sep 2024
14 wks
Decision time
6 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
9
Documents
9 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Construction of fourth floor level to create one self-contained residential unit
Reference
242027FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
W13 0NG
Ward
Council
Received
28 May 2024
Validated
9 Jul 2024
Target date
3 Sep 2024
Decision date
3 Sep 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
242027FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
W13 0NG
Ward
Council
Received
28 May 2024
Validated
9 Jul 2024
Target date
3 Sep 2024
Decision date
3 Sep 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 3 Sep 2024 — 14 weeks from submission (6 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
28 May 2024
Application received
9 Jul 2024
Application validated
3 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
3 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused
28 May 2024
Application received
9 Jul 2024
Application validated
3 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
3 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed fourth floor mansard roof extension addition, by reason of its
excessive bulk, design, appearance, scale and mass, would result in an
incongruous and discordant form of development, that would result in
demonstrable harm to local character, design and the visual amenity of the
streetscene. Accordingly, the proposal would be contrary to the National Planning
Policy Framework (2023), Policies D3, D4 and D6 of the London Plan (2023),
Policies 7.4, 7B of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013) and Policy
DAA of the Draft Ealing Local Plan (Reg19).
2
The proposed kitchen and dining space within the proposed dwelling, by
reason of its size, layout and dimensions, would form an impractical layout for
future occupants, with inadequate space for daily activities within the dwelling, to
the detriment of the living conditions of future residents. The proposal would
accordingly fail to comply with Policy D6 of the London Plan and the Mayors
Housing Design Standards LPG.
1
The proposed fourth floor mansard roof extension addition, by reason of its
excessive bulk, design, appearance, scale and mass, would result in an
incongruous and discordant form of development, that would result in
demonstrable harm to local character, design and the visual amenity of the
streetscene. Accordingly, the proposal would be contrary to the National Planning
Policy Framework (2023), Policies D3, D4 and D6 of the London Plan (2023),
Policies 7.4, 7B of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013) and Policy
DAA of the Draft Ealing Local Plan (Reg19).
2
The proposed kitchen and dining space within the proposed dwelling, by
reason of its size, layout and dimensions, would form an impractical layout for
future occupants, with inadequate space for daily activities within the dwelling, to
the detriment of the living conditions of future residents. The proposal would
accordingly fail to comply with Policy D6 of the London Plan and the Mayors
Housing Design Standards LPG.
Policies cited
D3D4D6NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.