Planning application · Ealing
242158FUL.
Full / Other Planning at 14 Park Parade Acton W3 9BD, received 7 Jun 2024 — refused on 23 Aug 2024 (delegated, Patrick Franklin).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
23 Aug 2024
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
26
Documents
26 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Construction of a two storey one bedroom dwellinghouse, rear of existing retail/residential unit (Following demolition of single storey storage building)
Reference
242158FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
7 Jun 2024
Validated
15 Jul 2024
Target date
9 Sep 2024
Decision date
23 Aug 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Reference
242158FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
7 Jun 2024
Validated
15 Jul 2024
Target date
9 Sep 2024
Decision date
23 Aug 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 23 Aug 2024, delegated decision by Patrick Franklin — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
7 Jun 2024
Application received
15 Jul 2024
Application validated
9 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
23 Aug 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Patrick Franklin
7 Jun 2024
Application received
15 Jul 2024
Application validated
9 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
23 Aug 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Patrick Franklin
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its scale, proportions,
cantilevered form and blocky appearance, would represent a cramped and
incongruous form of development that is out of keeping with the general pattern
of development in the area. The proposal would fail to comply with Policies D3
and D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development
Management DPD (2013), Ealing Design Guidance (2022), and Policy DAA of the
Ealing Local Plan (Reg 19).
2
The proposed development, by reason of its proximity to the existing
residential use at 14 Park Parade, would significantly impact the occupants of this
property, resulting in a significant loss of privacy as well as noise and
disturbance. The proposal would not comply with the NPPF (2023), Policies D3
and D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development
Management DPD (2013) and Policy DAA of the Ealing Local Plan (Reg 19)
(2024).
3
The proposed development, because of its gross internal area significantly
below the minimum space requirements for a 1b2p 2-storey unit, inadequate
floor-to-ceiling heights, and lack of genuinely private outdoor amenity space,
would provide a poor standard of accommodation for future occupants. The
proposed dwellinghouse would not comply with the Technical Housing Standards -
Nationally Described Space Standards (2015), Policy D6 of the London Plan
(2021), and Policies 7D and 3.5 of the Ealing Development Management DPD
(2013).
4
The proposed development, due to the location of the cycle parking outside
of the application site boundary behind a recently constructed brick wall, would
not give certainty that the proposed cycle stores could be relied upon for future
occupiers. As such, the development would not comply with Policy T5 of the
London Plan (2021).
1
The proposed development, by reason of its scale, proportions,
cantilevered form and blocky appearance, would represent a cramped and
incongruous form of development that is out of keeping with the general pattern
of development in the area. The proposal would fail to comply with Policies D3
and D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development
Management DPD (2013), Ealing Design Guidance (2022), and Policy DAA of the
Ealing Local Plan (Reg 19).
2
The proposed development, by reason of its proximity to the existing
residential use at 14 Park Parade, would significantly impact the occupants of this
property, resulting in a significant loss of privacy as well as noise and
disturbance. The proposal would not comply with the NPPF (2023), Policies D3
and D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development
Management DPD (2013) and Policy DAA of the Ealing Local Plan (Reg 19)
(2024).
3
The proposed development, because of its gross internal area significantly
below the minimum space requirements for a 1b2p 2-storey unit, inadequate
floor-to-ceiling heights, and lack of genuinely private outdoor amenity space,
would provide a poor standard of accommodation for future occupants. The
proposed dwellinghouse would not comply with the Technical Housing Standards -
Nationally Described Space Standards (2015), Policy D6 of the London Plan
(2021), and Policies 7D and 3.5 of the Ealing Development Management DPD
(2013).
Show all 4 rows
4
The proposed development, due to the location of the cycle parking outside
of the application site boundary behind a recently constructed brick wall, would
not give certainty that the proposed cycle stores could be relied upon for future
occupiers. As such, the development would not comply with Policy T5 of the
London Plan (2021).
Policies cited
D3D4NPPFD6Ealing Development Management DPD 3.5T5
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
2
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
2
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.