Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEalingHanger Hill ward242230FUL
Planning application · Ealing

242230FUL.

Maeda Gakuen Japanese School Sports Ground Queens Drive Acton W3 0HT

Full / Other Planning at Maeda Gakuen Japanese School Sports Ground Queens Drive Acton W3 0HT, received 5 Jun 2024 — refused on 31 Jul 2024 (delegated, Sam Benson).

EalingHanger HillW3 0HT242230FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
31 Jul 2024
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
5
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed single storey modular classroom to provide teaching space.

Reference
242230FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
W3 0HT
Council
Received
5 Jun 2024
Target date
31 Jul 2024
Decision date
31 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
242230FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
W3 0HT
Council
Received
5 Jun 2024
Target date
31 Jul 2024
Decision date
31 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
OFFICERS REPORT
31 Jul 2024
DECISION NOTICE
31 Jul 2024
LAMP POST
28 Jun 2024
CONSERVATION SITE NOTICE
28 Jun 2024
APPLICATION-REDACTED
28 Jun 2024
CORRESPONDENCE REDACTED
13 Jun 2024
DAS
6 Jun 2024
LOCATION PLAN
6 Jun 2024
PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1-200
6 Jun 2024
PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN
6 Jun 2024
OFFICERS REPORT
31 Jul 2024
DECISION NOTICE
31 Jul 2024
LAMP POST
28 Jun 2024
Show all 10 rows
CONSERVATION SITE NOTICE
28 Jun 2024
APPLICATION-REDACTED
28 Jun 2024
CORRESPONDENCE REDACTED
13 Jun 2024
DAS
6 Jun 2024
LOCATION PLAN
6 Jun 2024
PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1-200
6 Jun 2024
PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN
6 Jun 2024

Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 31 Jul 2024, delegated decision by Sam Benson — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
5 Jun 2024
Application received
31 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
31 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Sam Benson
5 Jun 2024
Application received
31 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
31 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Sam Benson

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed single storey modular classroom by way of its siting and design would result in an incongruous form of development in relation to the character of the host building and wider area; it is considered that the proposal would fail to be visually sympathetic to the host building or wider Hanger Hill Garden Estate Conservation Area. As such, the proposed development would fail to adhere to Section 12 and 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), polices D4 and HC1 Policies 1.1, 1.2 and 2.10 of the Ealing Core Strategy (2013); Policies 7.4, 7B and 7C of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013), and the Hanger Hill Garden Estate Conservation Area Management Plan (2009).
1
The proposed single storey modular classroom by way of its siting and design would result in an incongruous form of development in relation to the character of the host building and wider area; it is considered that the proposal would fail to be visually sympathetic to the host building or wider Hanger Hill Garden Estate Conservation Area. As such, the proposed development would fail to adhere to Section 12 and 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), polices D4 and HC1 Policies 1.1, 1.2 and 2.10 of the Ealing Core Strategy (2013); Policies 7.4, 7B and 7C of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013), and the Hanger Hill Garden Estate Conservation Area Management Plan (2009).
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 12National Planning Policy Framework 16Ealing Core Strategy 1.1Ealing Core Strategy 1.2Ealing Core Strategy 2.10NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
5
In support
0
Total comments
5
Objections
5
In support
0
Total comments
5
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.