Planning application · Ealing
243747FUL.
24 St Andrews Road Acton W3 7NF
Full / Other Planning at 24 St Andrews Road Acton W3 7NF, received 3 Oct 2024 — refused on 28 Nov 2024 (delegated, Chenhao Liu).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
28 Nov 2024
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
15
Documents
15 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Construction of a 2 bedroom residential dwelling, along with associated parking, landscaping, cycle and refuse storage on a side land adjacent of 24 St Andrews Road
Reference
243747FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
3 Oct 2024
Target date
28 Nov 2024
Decision date
28 Nov 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Reference
243747FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
3 Oct 2024
Target date
28 Nov 2024
Decision date
28 Nov 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 28 Nov 2024, delegated decision by Chenhao Liu — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
3 Oct 2024
Application received
28 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
28 Nov 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Chenhao Liu
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
3 Oct 2024
Application received
28 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
28 Nov 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Chenhao Liu
Show all 4 rows
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its scale, height, and proximity to
neighbouring properties and gardens, would result in significant adverse impacts
on the living conditions of the occupants of No. 28 Brassie Avenue. Specifically,
the development would cause a substantial loss of daylight and sunlight, harm
the outlook from habitable rooms, and increase the sense of enclosure
experienced by the neighbouring property. The proposal is therefore contrary to
policies D3 and D6 of the London Plan 2021 and policy 7B of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013).
2
The proposed forecourt car parking, due to the limited manoeuvrability
within the forecourt and the inadequate provision of visibility splays, would
increase the risk of road hazards, posing an unacceptable risk to the safety of the
local road network and its users. As such, the proposal is contrary to paragraph
108 of the NPPF 2023 and policy T4 of the London Plan 2021.
1
The proposed development, by reason of its scale, height, and proximity to
neighbouring properties and gardens, would result in significant adverse impacts
on the living conditions of the occupants of No. 28 Brassie Avenue. Specifically,
the development would cause a substantial loss of daylight and sunlight, harm
the outlook from habitable rooms, and increase the sense of enclosure
experienced by the neighbouring property. The proposal is therefore contrary to
policies D3 and D6 of the London Plan 2021 and policy 7B of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013).
2
The proposed forecourt car parking, due to the limited manoeuvrability
within the forecourt and the inadequate provision of visibility splays, would
increase the risk of road hazards, posing an unacceptable risk to the safety of the
local road network and its users. As such, the proposal is contrary to paragraph
108 of the NPPF 2023 and policy T4 of the London Plan 2021.
Policies cited
D3D6T4NPPF
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.