Planning application · Ealing
251211HH.
19 Brunswick Gardens Ealing W5 1AP
Householder at 19 Brunswick Gardens Ealing W5 1AP, received 27 Mar 2025 — refused on 4 Nov 2025 (delegated, Chris W.H. Tse).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
4 Nov 2025
32 wks
Decision time
24 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Installation of an electric slide gate; replacement of existing boundary wall; and installation of side metal fence (Retrospective)
Reference
251211HH
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W5 1AP
Ward
Council
Received
27 Mar 2025
Validated
22 Apr 2025
Target date
17 Jun 2025
Decision date
4 Nov 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
251211HH
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W5 1AP
Ward
Council
Received
27 Mar 2025
Validated
22 Apr 2025
Target date
17 Jun 2025
Decision date
4 Nov 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 4 Nov 2025, delegated decision by Chris W.H. Tse — 32 weeks from submission (24 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
27 Mar 2025
Application received
22 Apr 2025
Application validated
17 Jun 2025
Statutory target date
4 Nov 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Chris W.H. Tse
27 Mar 2025
Application received
22 Apr 2025
Application validated
17 Jun 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
4 Nov 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Chris W.H. Tse
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The as-built electric gate and replacement boundary wall, by reasons of its
excessive height, scale and inappropriate materials, would be contrary to the
consistent heritage and character of front boundary treatment along Brunswick
Gardens and the Brunswick Conservation Area.
The proposed boundary treatment would constitute an incongruous form of
development, to the detriment of the surrounding Conservation Area. Insufficient
information has been submitted to adequately justify or outweigh the potential
harm caused.
As such, the proposal is unacceptable in terms of its design and character and
fails to comply with policies HC1, D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), policies
7C, 7B, and 7.4 of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013), Generic
Conservation Area Management Plan (2023) and the Brunswick Conservation
Area Management Plan (2007).
2
The submitted drawings do not accurately reflect the as-built boundary
treatment, including its dimension, design, material and location. As a result, the
proposal fails to comply with Paragraph 140 of the NPPF (2024).
1
The as-built electric gate and replacement boundary wall, by reasons of its
excessive height, scale and inappropriate materials, would be contrary to the
consistent heritage and character of front boundary treatment along Brunswick
Gardens and the Brunswick Conservation Area.
The proposed boundary treatment would constitute an incongruous form of
development, to the detriment of the surrounding Conservation Area. Insufficient
information has been submitted to adequately justify or outweigh the potential
harm caused.
As such, the proposal is unacceptable in terms of its design and character and
fails to comply with policies HC1, D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), policies
7C, 7B, and 7.4 of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013), Generic
Conservation Area Management Plan (2023) and the Brunswick Conservation
Area Management Plan (2007).
2
The submitted drawings do not accurately reflect the as-built boundary
treatment, including its dimension, design, material and location. As a result, the
proposal fails to comply with Paragraph 140 of the NPPF (2024).
Policies cited
HC1D3D4Ealing Development Management DPD 7.4NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.