Planning application · Ealing
251461FUL.
28 Penard Road Southall UB2 4XN
Full / Other Planning at 28 Penard Road Southall UB2 4XN, received 14 Apr 2025 — refused on 26 Jun 2025 (delegated, Cathy Munonyedi).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
26 Jun 2025
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
15
Documents
15 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Single storey rear extension
Reference
251461FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB2 4XN
Ward
Council
Received
14 Apr 2025
Target date
9 Jun 2025
Decision date
26 Jun 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
251461FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB2 4XN
Ward
Council
Received
14 Apr 2025
Target date
9 Jun 2025
Decision date
26 Jun 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 26 Jun 2025, delegated decision by Cathy Munonyedi — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
14 Apr 2025
Application received
9 Jun 2025
Statutory target date
26 Jun 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Cathy Munonyedi
14 Apr 2025
Application received
9 Jun 2025
Statutory target date
26 Jun 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Cathy Munonyedi
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed single storey rear extension by reason of its depth, height
and proximity to side boundary would constitute an over dominant and
overbearing form of development resulting in loss of light, outlook and undue
increased feeling of enclosure to the detriment of the residential amenities of the
occupants of no. 27 Penard Road and bearing in mind the cumulative impact of
existing development would be out of keeping with the pattern of development
within this part of Penard Road. As such, the proposal is contrary to D1 and D3 of
the London Plan (2021), policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development
Management DPD (2013) Ealing's Local Plan (Reg.22) policy DAA and National
Planning Policy Framework (2025) - section 12.
1
The proposed single storey rear extension by reason of its depth, height
and proximity to side boundary would constitute an over dominant and
overbearing form of development resulting in loss of light, outlook and undue
increased feeling of enclosure to the detriment of the residential amenities of the
occupants of no. 27 Penard Road and bearing in mind the cumulative impact of
existing development would be out of keeping with the pattern of development
within this part of Penard Road. As such, the proposal is contrary to D1 and D3 of
the London Plan (2021), policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development
Management DPD (2013) Ealing's Local Plan (Reg.22) policy DAA and National
Planning Policy Framework (2025) - section 12.
Policies cited
D1D3NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.