Planning application · Ealing
252356HH.
38 Alderney Gardens Northolt UB5 5BS
Householder at 38 Alderney Gardens Northolt UB5 5BS, received 18 Jun 2025 — refused on 8 Aug 2025 (delegated, Chris W.H. Tse).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
8 Aug 2025
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
16
Documents
16 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Part two storey and part single storey rear extension; hip to gable roof conversion; rear roof extensions; and rear garden outbuilding (following demolition of the existing rear extension).
Reference
252356HH
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
18 Jun 2025
Target date
13 Aug 2025
Decision date
8 Aug 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Reference
252356HH
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
18 Jun 2025
Target date
13 Aug 2025
Decision date
8 Aug 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 8 Aug 2025, delegated decision by Chris W.H. Tse — 7 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
18 Jun 2025
Application received
13 Aug 2025
Statutory target date
8 Aug 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Chris W.H. Tse
18 Jun 2025
Application received
13 Aug 2025
Statutory target date
8 Aug 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Chris W.H. Tse
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed part two storey and part single storey rear extension, by
reasons of its excessive depth and width would be an incongruous and discordant
addition to the front and side of the host building resulting in harm to the
character and appearance of the host building and the local area. Therefore, the
proposal would be contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2025),
and Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), and Policies 7.4, 7B of the
Ealing Development Management DPD (2013).
2
The proposed rear roof extensions and the roof of proposed 2-storey side
extension, by reasons of their excessive size, lack of set-down from the main
ridge and inappropriate design, would be over-dominate and incongruous to the
host building's roof and existing roofscape of the local area. Therefore, the
proposal would be contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2025),
and Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policies 7.4, 7B of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013), and Ealing Housing Design Guidance
(2022).
3
The single storey rear extension, by reason of its excessive depth, height
and proximity to the boundary, would result in in a form of unneighbourly and
overbearing development and adversely affect the residential amenities of
neighbouring property at No. 40 Alderney Gardens. The proposal therefore would
fail to comply with the objectives of the policies D3 and D6 of the London Plan
(2021), policies 7B of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013) and
policy DAA of Ealing's draft new Local Plan (2024).
1
The proposed part two storey and part single storey rear extension, by
reasons of its excessive depth and width would be an incongruous and discordant
addition to the front and side of the host building resulting in harm to the
character and appearance of the host building and the local area. Therefore, the
proposal would be contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2025),
and Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), and Policies 7.4, 7B of the
Ealing Development Management DPD (2013).
2
The proposed rear roof extensions and the roof of proposed 2-storey side
extension, by reasons of their excessive size, lack of set-down from the main
ridge and inappropriate design, would be over-dominate and incongruous to the
host building's roof and existing roofscape of the local area. Therefore, the
proposal would be contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2025),
and Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policies 7.4, 7B of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013), and Ealing Housing Design Guidance
(2022).
3
The single storey rear extension, by reason of its excessive depth, height
and proximity to the boundary, would result in in a form of unneighbourly and
overbearing development and adversely affect the residential amenities of
neighbouring property at No. 40 Alderney Gardens. The proposal therefore would
fail to comply with the objectives of the policies D3 and D6 of the London Plan
(2021), policies 7B of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013) and
policy DAA of Ealing's draft new Local Plan (2024).
Policies cited
D3D4NPPFD6
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.