Planning application · Ealing
252967HH.
6 Hodder Drive Perivale UB6 8LH
Householder at 6 Hodder Drive Perivale UB6 8LH, received 4 Aug 2025 — refused on 23 Oct 2025 (delegated, Silindile Khumalo).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
23 Oct 2025
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
8
Documents
8 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Part two, part single storey rear extension
Reference
252967HH
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB6 8LH
Ward
Council
Received
4 Aug 2025
Validated
18 Aug 2025
Target date
13 Oct 2025
Decision date
23 Oct 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
252967HH
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB6 8LH
Ward
Council
Received
4 Aug 2025
Validated
18 Aug 2025
Target date
13 Oct 2025
Decision date
23 Oct 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 23 Oct 2025, delegated decision by Silindile Khumalo — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
4 Aug 2025
Application received
18 Aug 2025
Application validated
13 Oct 2025
Statutory target date
23 Oct 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Silindile Khumalo
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
4 Aug 2025
Application received
18 Aug 2025
Application validated
13 Oct 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
23 Oct 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Silindile Khumalo
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed first floor rear extension, by reason of its width, bulk, design
and scale would fail to harmonise with the original building on the site and would
constitute an incongruous and dominant addition to the building and local area
that would fail to appear subordinate to the original house and would result in
being out of keeping with the character and general pattern of area. As such, the
development would therefore fail to comply with policies D3 and D4 of the London
Plan (2021), policies 7B and 7.4 of the Ealing Development Management DPD
(2013), and Ealing Housing Design Guidance (2022).
1
The proposed first floor rear extension, by reason of its width, bulk, design
and scale would fail to harmonise with the original building on the site and would
constitute an incongruous and dominant addition to the building and local area
that would fail to appear subordinate to the original house and would result in
being out of keeping with the character and general pattern of area. As such, the
development would therefore fail to comply with policies D3 and D4 of the London
Plan (2021), policies 7B and 7.4 of the Ealing Development Management DPD
(2013), and Ealing Housing Design Guidance (2022).
Policies cited
D3D4Ealing Development Management DPD 7.4
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.