Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEalingDormers Wells ward253367HH
Planning application · Ealing

253367HH.

1 Carlyle Gardens Southall UB1 2BN

Householder at 1 Carlyle Gardens Southall UB1 2BN, received 3 Sep 2025 — refused on 18 Mar 2026 (delegated, Sophie Hennessy).

EalingDormers WellsUB1 2BN253367HH
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
18 Mar 2026
28 wks
Decision time
20 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
8
Documents
8 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey, part two storey side extension; single storey side/rear extension; part first floor rear extension; single storey front porch extension; removal of chimney stack; rear roof extension and increase in ridge height

Reference
253367HH
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB1 2BN
Council
Received
3 Sep 2025
Target date
29 Oct 2025
Decision date
18 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
253367HH
Type
Householder
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB1 2BN
Council
Received
3 Sep 2025
Target date
29 Oct 2025
Decision date
18 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
OFFICERS REPORT
18 Mar 2026
DECISION NOTICE
18 Mar 2026
PLANS
10 Mar 2026
PLANS
10 Mar 2026
NEIGHBOUR SITE NOTICE
23 Oct 2025
SITE NOTICE MAP
23 Oct 2025
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
3 Sept 2025
2515-OS-01 - LOCATION PLAN
3 Sept 2025
OFFICERS REPORT
18 Mar 2026
DECISION NOTICE
18 Mar 2026
PLANS
10 Mar 2026
Show all 8 rows
PLANS
10 Mar 2026
NEIGHBOUR SITE NOTICE
23 Oct 2025
SITE NOTICE MAP
23 Oct 2025
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
3 Sept 2025
2515-OS-01 - LOCATION PLAN
3 Sept 2025

Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 18 Mar 2026, delegated decision by Sophie Hennessy — 28 weeks from submission (20 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
3 Sep 2025
Application received
29 Oct 2025
Statutory target date
18 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Sophie Hennessy
3 Sep 2025
Application received
29 Oct 2025
Statutory target date
18 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Sophie Hennessy

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed retention of the raised main roof ridge and retention of the rear roof extension would result in unacceptable change to the appearance of the host building and results in overscale additions, lacking in subordination which taken as a whole are harmful to the appearance of the host building, and is out of keeping with the character and appearance of the area. As such the proposal is considered to run contrary to the NPPF (2025), policies D4 of the London Plan (2021), policies 7.4 of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013).
2
The application is recommended for refusal as the submitted drawings contain discrepancies and do not accurately reflect the development built on site including the roof form to the first floor side extension, the loss of the pitched roof on the side elevation of the main dwelling, the addition of a ground floor side elevation window, and the formation of new windows at first floor level on the rear elevation. As a result, the proposal cannot be properly assessed and is contrary to London Plan Policy D4 (Delivering Good Design) and Policy 7C of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013).
3
The proposed first floor rear extension, by reason of its scale, bulk and form, would appear as an overbearing and disproportionate addition that fails to respect the architectural integrity, proportions of the host dwelling. The resulting massing would create an unsympathetic and visually intrusive form, contrary to the design requirements of the NPPF (2025), Policies 7.4 of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013), and Policies D1 and D4 of the London Plan (2021).
1
The proposed retention of the raised main roof ridge and retention of the rear roof extension would result in unacceptable change to the appearance of the host building and results in overscale additions, lacking in subordination which taken as a whole are harmful to the appearance of the host building, and is out of keeping with the character and appearance of the area. As such the proposal is considered to run contrary to the NPPF (2025), policies D4 of the London Plan (2021), policies 7.4 of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013).
2
The application is recommended for refusal as the submitted drawings contain discrepancies and do not accurately reflect the development built on site including the roof form to the first floor side extension, the loss of the pitched roof on the side elevation of the main dwelling, the addition of a ground floor side elevation window, and the formation of new windows at first floor level on the rear elevation. As a result, the proposal cannot be properly assessed and is contrary to London Plan Policy D4 (Delivering Good Design) and Policy 7C of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013).
3
The proposed first floor rear extension, by reason of its scale, bulk and form, would appear as an overbearing and disproportionate addition that fails to respect the architectural integrity, proportions of the host dwelling. The resulting massing would create an unsympathetic and visually intrusive form, contrary to the design requirements of the NPPF (2025), Policies 7.4 of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013), and Policies D1 and D4 of the London Plan (2021).
Policies cited
D4Ealing Development Management DPD 7.4NPPFD1

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.