Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Replacement of existing timber single-glazed boxed sash windows to the front, flank and rear elevations in uPVC to TRC heritage double-glazed windows; replacement of existing timber single-glazed casement windows to rear and flank elevations to Genesis uPVC double-glazed heritage windows.; replacement of metal rear door to uPVC door.
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 26 Mar 2026, delegated decision by Georgina Heale — 28 weeks from submission (20 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
11 Sep 2025
Application received
3 Nov 2025
Application validated
29 Dec 2025
Statutory target date
26 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Georgina Heale
11 Sep 2025
Application received
3 Nov 2025
Application validated
29 Dec 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
26 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Georgina Heale
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed window replacements by reason of the omission of the
projecting square drip rail and concealed trickle vents would fail to harmonise
with the host building would result in less than substantial harm (at the low end)
and would result in an unreasonable degree of visual impact along the elevations
to the host building and the Creffield Conservation Area. No public benefits have
been identified that would outweigh this harm. The proposed development would
therefore run contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2025), the
Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act (1990), policies D4 and
HC1 of the London Plan (2021), policies 7B, 7C and 7.4 of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013), the Generic Conservation Area
Management Plan (2023), and the Creffield Conservation Area Management Plan
(2007).
1
The proposed window replacements by reason of the omission of the
projecting square drip rail and concealed trickle vents would fail to harmonise
with the host building would result in less than substantial harm (at the low end)
and would result in an unreasonable degree of visual impact along the elevations
to the host building and the Creffield Conservation Area. No public benefits have
been identified that would outweigh this harm. The proposed development would
therefore run contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2025), the
Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act (1990), policies D4 and
HC1 of the London Plan (2021), policies 7B, 7C and 7.4 of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013), the Generic Conservation Area
Management Plan (2023), and the Creffield Conservation Area Management Plan
(2007).
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.