Planning application · Ealing
254009FUL.
Land To Rear Of 1 Albert Terrace Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1RL
Full / Other Planning at Land To Rear Of 1 Albert Terrace Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1RL, received 22 Oct 2025 — refused on 19 Mar 2026 (delegated, Cheryl Yeung).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
19 Mar 2026
21 wks
Decision time
13 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Construction of single storey detached residential dwelling with associated bin storage and bicycle parking (following demolition of existing storage buildings and garage)
Reference
254009FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W5 1RL
Ward
Council
Received
22 Oct 2025
Target date
17 Dec 2025
Decision date
19 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
254009FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W5 1RL
Ward
Council
Received
22 Oct 2025
Target date
17 Dec 2025
Decision date
19 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 19 Mar 2026, delegated decision by Cheryl Yeung — 21 weeks from submission (13 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
22 Oct 2025
Application received
17 Dec 2025
Statutory target date
19 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Cheryl Yeung
22 Oct 2025
Application received
17 Dec 2025
Statutory target date
19 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Cheryl Yeung
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal, by reason of its siting, design, appearance and scale would
constitute an overdevelopment of a constrained site with a cramped, incongruous
and dominant appearance that would be out of keeping with the prevailing
pattern of development of the area and harmful to surrounding visual amenity
and character including that of the street scene. It is therefore contrary to
Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013), and Policy DAA of the Ealing Draft Local
Plan (Regulation 22).
2
The proposed development, by reason of failing to meet floor-to-ceiling
height and private amenity space requirement, would constitute a substandard
and unsustainable form of development that would provide poor quality living
conditions for residents. Additionally, the proposal fails to provide sufficient
details in respect of bedroom, living, dining area arrangement. The proposal
would therefore fail to comply with policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), policy 7B
of the Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document (2013), the
NPPF (2025) and Ealing's Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs): practical
guidance for applicants (2025).
1
The proposal, by reason of its siting, design, appearance and scale would
constitute an overdevelopment of a constrained site with a cramped, incongruous
and dominant appearance that would be out of keeping with the prevailing
pattern of development of the area and harmful to surrounding visual amenity
and character including that of the street scene. It is therefore contrary to
Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013), and Policy DAA of the Ealing Draft Local
Plan (Regulation 22).
2
The proposed development, by reason of failing to meet floor-to-ceiling
height and private amenity space requirement, would constitute a substandard
and unsustainable form of development that would provide poor quality living
conditions for residents. Additionally, the proposal fails to provide sufficient
details in respect of bedroom, living, dining area arrangement. The proposal
would therefore fail to comply with policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), policy 7B
of the Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document (2013), the
NPPF (2025) and Ealing's Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs): practical
guidance for applicants (2025).
Policies cited
D3D4D6NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
2
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
2
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.