Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 30 Mar 2026, delegated decision by Georgina Heale — 19 weeks from submission (11 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
18 Nov 2025
Application received
13 Jan 2026
Statutory target date
30 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Georgina Heale
18 Nov 2025
Application received
13 Jan 2026
Statutory target date
30 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Georgina Heale
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed crossover, by reason of its length over the existing grass
verge, would result in a significant loss of soft open green space fronting the site
and would result in a form of intrusive development of the subject site which
would adversely affect the character of the original dwellinghouse as well as the
character of the area and the visual amenity of the street scene. As such, the
proposed development would fail to adhere to the Council's Vehicle Crossovers:
Application Pack for Residents (2021), policies D3, D6, D8, T3 and T4 of the
London Plan (2021), 5.10, 7A, 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development
Management DPD (2013), policy 1.1 of the Ealing Local Development Framework
- Adopted (Core) Strategy (2012) and policy DAA of Ealing's Draft New Local Plan
(2022).
2
The proposed vehicular crossover as illustrated on drawing A0103
(Proposed Parking Provisions) by reason of exceeding the 2.4m standard width
specification for a single crossover would result in an incongruous feature within
the street scene, harming visual amenity and setting a harmful precedent for
future development. By way of its interruption of the footway for a width of
2.89m, it would also present a safety risk to pedestrians and set a precedent for
other such crossovers having a cumulative safety impact and loss of distinct
public and private space within the street scene, harming both safety and
amenity. As such, the proposal is contrary to the National Planning Policy
Framework (2025), policies G5, T3 and T4 of the London Plan (2021), policies
5.10 and 7A of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013), The Vehicle
Crossovers: Application Pack for Residents (2021).
1
The proposed crossover, by reason of its length over the existing grass
verge, would result in a significant loss of soft open green space fronting the site
and would result in a form of intrusive development of the subject site which
would adversely affect the character of the original dwellinghouse as well as the
character of the area and the visual amenity of the street scene. As such, the
proposed development would fail to adhere to the Council's Vehicle Crossovers:
Application Pack for Residents (2021), policies D3, D6, D8, T3 and T4 of the
London Plan (2021), 5.10, 7A, 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development
Management DPD (2013), policy 1.1 of the Ealing Local Development Framework
- Adopted (Core) Strategy (2012) and policy DAA of Ealing's Draft New Local Plan
(2022).
2
The proposed vehicular crossover as illustrated on drawing A0103
(Proposed Parking Provisions) by reason of exceeding the 2.4m standard width
specification for a single crossover would result in an incongruous feature within
the street scene, harming visual amenity and setting a harmful precedent for
future development. By way of its interruption of the footway for a width of
2.89m, it would also present a safety risk to pedestrians and set a precedent for
other such crossovers having a cumulative safety impact and loss of distinct
public and private space within the street scene, harming both safety and
amenity. As such, the proposal is contrary to the National Planning Policy
Framework (2025), policies G5, T3 and T4 of the London Plan (2021), policies
5.10 and 7A of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013), The Vehicle
Crossovers: Application Pack for Residents (2021).
Policies cited
D3D6D8T3T4Ealing Local Development Framework 1.1G5NPPF
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.