Planning application · Ealing
254832FUL.
Land Rear Of 4 Greenford Road Greenford UB6 9AT
Full / Other Planning at Land Rear Of 4 Greenford Road Greenford UB6 9AT, received 24 Dec 2025 — refused on 30 Apr 2026 (delegated, Cheryl Yeung).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
30 Apr 2026
18 wks
Decision time
10 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
21
Documents
21 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Construction of two storey dwellinghouse with loft space accommodation to provide two self-contained dwellings (following demolition of existing outbuilding and storage); and provision of associated private amenity, landscaping, cycle store, refuse and recycling spaces
Reference
254832FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB6 9AT
Ward
Council
Received
24 Dec 2025
Target date
18 Feb 2026
Decision date
30 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
254832FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB6 9AT
Ward
Council
Received
24 Dec 2025
Target date
18 Feb 2026
Decision date
30 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 30 Apr 2026, delegated decision by Cheryl Yeung — 18 weeks from submission (10 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
24 Dec 2025
Application received
18 Feb 2026
Statutory target date
30 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Cheryl Yeung
24 Dec 2025
Application received
18 Feb 2026
Statutory target date
30 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Cheryl Yeung
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The development by reason of its design and scale would represent a
dominant form of overdevelopment on this constrained site that is out-of-keeping
with the prevailing pattern of development, resulting in harm to the character of
the area. The proposal therefore remains contrary to Policies D3 and D4 of the
London Plan (2021), Policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development Management
DPD (2013), and Policy DAA of the Ealing Draft Local Plan (Regulation 22).
2
The proposed development, by virtue of its location and design, would
result in disturbance of the living conditions of future occupants in relation to
noise and air quality. Furthermore, the failure of Flat 2 to meet the minimum
space standards for combined living, dining and kitchen accommodation, together
with the poor outlook from the proposed loft-level bedroom, would result in a
substandard and unsustainable form of development that would not provide
satisfactory living conditions for future residents. The proposal would therefore be
contrary to Policies D6 and D14 of the London Plan (2021), Policy 7B of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013), the National Planning Policy Framework
(2025), and the London Plan Guidance: Housing Design Standards (2023).
1
The development by reason of its design and scale would represent a
dominant form of overdevelopment on this constrained site that is out-of-keeping
with the prevailing pattern of development, resulting in harm to the character of
the area. The proposal therefore remains contrary to Policies D3 and D4 of the
London Plan (2021), Policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development Management
DPD (2013), and Policy DAA of the Ealing Draft Local Plan (Regulation 22).
2
The proposed development, by virtue of its location and design, would
result in disturbance of the living conditions of future occupants in relation to
noise and air quality. Furthermore, the failure of Flat 2 to meet the minimum
space standards for combined living, dining and kitchen accommodation, together
with the poor outlook from the proposed loft-level bedroom, would result in a
substandard and unsustainable form of development that would not provide
satisfactory living conditions for future residents. The proposal would therefore be
contrary to Policies D6 and D14 of the London Plan (2021), Policy 7B of the Ealing
Development Management DPD (2013), the National Planning Policy Framework
(2025), and the London Plan Guidance: Housing Design Standards (2023).
Policies cited
D3D4D6D14NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.