Planning application · Ealing
260035FUL.
81 Lady Margaret Road Southall UB1 2PW
Full / Other Planning at 81 Lady Margaret Road Southall UB1 2PW, received 5 Jan 2026 — refused on 23 Mar 2026 (delegated, Oliver Ramsay).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
23 Mar 2026
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
14
Documents
14 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Conversion of dwellinghouse into two self-contained flats; and alterations to existing front porch involving new entrance doors
Reference
260035FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB1 2PW
Ward
Council
Received
5 Jan 2026
Validated
30 Jan 2026
Target date
27 Mar 2026
Decision date
23 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
260035FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB1 2PW
Ward
Council
Received
5 Jan 2026
Validated
30 Jan 2026
Target date
27 Mar 2026
Decision date
23 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 23 Mar 2026, delegated decision by Oliver Ramsay — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
5 Jan 2026
Application received
30 Jan 2026
Application validated
27 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
23 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Oliver Ramsay
5 Jan 2026
Application received
30 Jan 2026
Application validated
27 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
23 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Oliver Ramsay
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of the minimum space standard not
being met for Flat 1 and both Flat 1 and Flat 2 failing to meet the minimum
required space standards for living, dining and kitchen areas would result in poor
quality of accommodation for the future occupants. No sectional drawings have
been provided to demonstrate the minimum headroom requirement of 2.5m for
at least 75% of the GIA would be provided. As such, the proposal would result in
poor quality of accommodation for the future occupants, failing to comply with
the objectives of Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), policies 3.5 and 7B of the
Ealing Development Management DPD (2013), Housing Design Standards LPG
(2023) and Ealing Draft Local Plan (Regulation 22).
2
The proposed development, due to its failure to provide adequate waste
and recycling facilities. The proposal therefore fails to comply with Policy SI 7 of
the London Plan (2021).
1
The proposed development, by reason of the minimum space standard not
being met for Flat 1 and both Flat 1 and Flat 2 failing to meet the minimum
required space standards for living, dining and kitchen areas would result in poor
quality of accommodation for the future occupants. No sectional drawings have
been provided to demonstrate the minimum headroom requirement of 2.5m for
at least 75% of the GIA would be provided. As such, the proposal would result in
poor quality of accommodation for the future occupants, failing to comply with
the objectives of Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), policies 3.5 and 7B of the
Ealing Development Management DPD (2013), Housing Design Standards LPG
(2023) and Ealing Draft Local Plan (Regulation 22).
2
The proposed development, due to its failure to provide adequate waste
and recycling facilities. The proposal therefore fails to comply with Policy SI 7 of
the London Plan (2021).
Policies cited
D6SI7
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.