Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEalingNortholt Mandeville ward260715FUL
Planning application · Ealing

260715FUL.

32 Danemead Grove Northolt UB5 4NY

Full / Other Planning at 32 Danemead Grove Northolt UB5 4NY, received 19 Feb 2026 — refused on 2 Jun 2026 (delegated, Grace To).

EalingNortholt MandevilleUB5 4NY260715FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
2 Jun 2026
15 wks
Decision time
7 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
6
Documents
6 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Conversion of ground and first floor flats into one pair of semi-detached dwellinghouses; part two, part single storey side/rear extension

Reference
260715FUL
Type
Full Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB5 4NY
Council
Received
19 Feb 2026
Validated
10 Mar 2026
Target date
5 May 2026
Decision date
2 Jun 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
260715FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB5 4NY
Council
Received
19 Feb 2026
Validated
10 Mar 2026
Target date
5 May 2026
Decision date
2 Jun 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
OFFICERS REPORT
2 Jun 2026
DECISION NOTICE
2 Jun 2026
NEIGHBOUR SITE NOTICE
10 Mar 2026
LAMPOST LOCATIONS
10 Mar 2026
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
19 Feb 2026
15.01.26
19 Feb 2026
OFFICERS REPORT
2 Jun 2026
DECISION NOTICE
2 Jun 2026
NEIGHBOUR SITE NOTICE
10 Mar 2026
Show all 6 rows
LAMPOST LOCATIONS
10 Mar 2026
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
19 Feb 2026
15.01.26
19 Feb 2026

Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 2 Jun 2026, delegated decision by Grace To — 15 weeks from submission (7 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
19 Feb 2026
Application received
10 Mar 2026
Application validated
5 May 2026
Statutory target date
2 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Grace To
19 Feb 2026
Application received
10 Mar 2026
Application validated
5 May 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
2 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Grace To

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed part single, part two storey side/rear extension, by reason of its prominent corner location, design, width, scale and mass, would be unsympathetic to the scale and character of the host dwelling, to the detriment of its character and appearance, and be out of keeping with the semi-detached pattern of development, resulting harm to visual amenities of the Danemead Grove. As such, the proposal is contrary policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013), policy DAA of Ealing's draft new Local Plan (Regulation 22) and the Ealing Housing Design Guidance 2022.
1
The proposed part single, part two storey side/rear extension, by reason of its prominent corner location, design, width, scale and mass, would be unsympathetic to the scale and character of the host dwelling, to the detriment of its character and appearance, and be out of keeping with the semi-detached pattern of development, resulting harm to visual amenities of the Danemead Grove. As such, the proposal is contrary policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013), policy DAA of Ealing's draft new Local Plan (Regulation 22) and the Ealing Housing Design Guidance 2022.
Policies cited
D3D4

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.