Planning application · Ealing
261265FUL.
Flat A (First Floor Rear Flat) 181 Uxbridge Road Hanwell W7 3TH
Full / Other Planning at Flat A (First Floor Rear Flat) 181 Uxbridge Road Hanwell W7 3TH, received 24 Mar 2026 — refused on 5 Jun 2026 (delegated, Grace To).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
5 Jun 2026
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
13
Documents
13 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Construction of a part second floor rear extension.
Reference
261265FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W7 3TH
Ward
Council
Received
24 Mar 2026
Target date
19 May 2026
Decision date
5 Jun 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Pending Consideration
Council register
Reference
261265FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W7 3TH
Ward
Council
Received
24 Mar 2026
Target date
19 May 2026
Decision date
5 Jun 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Pending Consideration
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 5 Jun 2026, delegated decision by Grace To — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
24 Mar 2026
Application received
19 May 2026
Statutory target date
5 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Grace To
24 Mar 2026
Application received
19 May 2026
Statutory target date
5 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Grace To
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed construction of a part of second floor rear extension, by
reason of their scale, massing, prominence, design, materials, depth and
appearance, constitute an incongruous form of development in an elevated
position inconsistent with the prevailing pattern of development in the local area,
and result in detrimental overlooking and loss of privacy to neighbouring
residential gardens, overbearing and sense of enclosure, daylight and sunlight
impact to the detriment of the character and appearance of the area and
residential amenities. As such, the proposal runs contrary to policies D3, D4 and
D6 of the London Plan (2021), policies 7A, 7B and 7.4 of the Ealing Development
Management DPD (2013), Ealing Draft Local Plan (2024) and Housing Design
Guidance (2022).
1
The proposed construction of a part of second floor rear extension, by
reason of their scale, massing, prominence, design, materials, depth and
appearance, constitute an incongruous form of development in an elevated
position inconsistent with the prevailing pattern of development in the local area,
and result in detrimental overlooking and loss of privacy to neighbouring
residential gardens, overbearing and sense of enclosure, daylight and sunlight
impact to the detriment of the character and appearance of the area and
residential amenities. As such, the proposal runs contrary to policies D3, D4 and
D6 of the London Plan (2021), policies 7A, 7B and 7.4 of the Ealing Development
Management DPD (2013), Ealing Draft Local Plan (2024) and Housing Design
Guidance (2022).
Policies cited
D3D4D6Ealing Development Management DPD 7.4
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.