Planning Atlas
Planning application · Ealing

P/2000/2247.

CCTV Camera At Junc. Of Mill Hill Road And Langley Drive London W3 8SD

Full / Other Planning at CCTV Camera At Junc. Of Mill Hill Road And Langley Drive London W3 8SD, received 26 Jun 2000 — other on 5 Oct 2000 by committee.

EalingW3 8SDP/2000/2247
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Other
Outcome
5 Oct 2000
14 wks
Decision time
6 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Pole mounted CCTV camera at junction of Langley Drive, and Mill Hill Road W3

Reference
P/2000/2247
Type
Full Application
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
W3 8SD
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
26 Jun 2000
Target date
21 Aug 2000
Decision date
5 Oct 2000
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Historic Application
Reference
P/2000/2247
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
W3 8SD
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
26 Jun 2000
Target date
21 Aug 2000
Decision date
5 Oct 2000
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Historic Application
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Other on 5 Oct 2000, determined by the planning committee — 14 weeks from submission (6 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
26 Jun 2000
Application received
21 Aug 2000
Statutory target date
5 Oct 2000
Committee decision: Other
26 Jun 2000
Application received
21 Aug 2000
Statutory target date
5 Oct 2000
Committee decision: Other

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.