Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEalingW3 7HRBurghley Tower Trinity Way Acton London W3 7HRP/2000/2758
Planning application · Ealing

P/2000/2758.

Burghley Tower Trinity Way Acton London W3 7HR

Full / Other Planning at Burghley Tower Trinity Way Acton London W3 7HR, received 1 Aug 2000 — approved on 9 Oct 2000.

EalingW3 7HRP/2000/2758
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Approved
Outcome
9 Oct 2000
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Upgrade of telecommunications equipment to include erection of equipment cabin, pole antennae and transmission dishes at roof level of Burghley Tower

Reference
P/2000/2758
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
1 Aug 2000
Target date
26 Sep 2000
Decision date
9 Oct 2000
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Conditional Consent
Reference
P/2000/2758
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
1 Aug 2000
Target date
26 Sep 2000
Decision date
9 Oct 2000
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Conditional Consent
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 9 Oct 2000 — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
1 Aug 2000
Application received
26 Sep 2000
Statutory target date
9 Oct 2000
Delegated decision: Approved
1 Aug 2000
Application received
26 Sep 2000
Statutory target date
9 Oct 2000
Delegated decision: Approved

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.