Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEalingHobbayne wardW7 1BU8 Brants Walk Hanwell London W7 1BU LondonP/2003/3196
Planning application · Ealing

P/2003/3196.

8 Brants Walk Hanwell London W7 1BU London

Lawful Development Certificate at 8 Brants Walk Hanwell London W7 1BU London, received 6 Aug 2003 — approved on 29 Sep 2003 (delegated, Amelia Smith).

EalingHobbayneW7 1BUP/2003/3196
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Approved
Outcome
29 Sep 2003
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey extension to rear of house (Lawful Development Certificate)

Reference
P/2003/3196
Type
Certificate of Lawfulness - Proposed
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
6 Aug 2003
Target date
30 Sep 2003
Decision date
29 Sep 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Permitted Development
Reference
P/2003/3196
Type
Certificate of Lawfulness - Proposed
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
6 Aug 2003
Target date
30 Sep 2003
Decision date
29 Sep 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Permitted Development
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 29 Sep 2003, delegated decision by Amelia Smith — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
6 Aug 2003
Application received
30 Sep 2003
Statutory target date
29 Sep 2003
Delegated decision: Approved · Amelia Smith
6 Aug 2003
Application received
30 Sep 2003
Statutory target date
29 Sep 2003
Delegated decision: Approved · Amelia Smith

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.