Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Ealing›…Acton Central ward›P/2005/1722
Planning application · Ealing

P/2005/1722.

11 Myrtle Road Acton London W3 6DX London

Lawful Development Certificate at 11 Myrtle Road Acton London W3 6DX London, received 29 Apr 2005 — approved on 23 Jun 2005.

Ealing›Acton Central›W3 6DX›P/2005/1722
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Approved
Outcome
23 Jun 2005
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed single storey extension to rear of house (Lawful Development Certificate for Proposed Development)

Reference
P/2005/1722
Type
Certificate of Lawfulness - Proposed
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
W3 6DX
Ward
Council
Received
29 Apr 2005
Target date
24 Jun 2005
Decision date
23 Jun 2005
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Permitted Development
Council register
Reference
P/2005/1722
Type
Certificate of Lawfulness - Proposed
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
W3 6DX
Ward
Council
Received
29 Apr 2005
Target date
24 Jun 2005
Decision date
23 Jun 2005
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Permitted Development
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 23 Jun 2005 — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
29 Apr 2005
Application received
24 Jun 2005
Statutory target date
23 Jun 2005
Delegated decision: Approved
29 Apr 2005
Application received
24 Jun 2005
Statutory target date
23 Jun 2005
Delegated decision: Approved

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.