Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEalingHanger Hill wardP/2008/0959
Planning application · Ealing

P/2008/0959.

62 Brentham Way Ealing W5 1BE London

Full / Other Planning at 62 Brentham Way Ealing W5 1BE London, received 4 Mar 2008 — approved on 24 Apr 2008 (delegated, Chong Lin Britto).

EalingHanger HillW5 1BEP/2008/0959
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Approved
Outcome
24 Apr 2008
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
0 comments
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Replacement of dining room window in rear elevation with double doors and side window unit.

Reference
P/2008/0959
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W5 1BE
Council
Received
4 Mar 2008
Decision date
24 Apr 2008
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Conditional Consent
Reference
P/2008/0959
Type
Full Application
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W5 1BE
Council
Received
4 Mar 2008
Decision date
24 Apr 2008
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Conditional Consent
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 24 Apr 2008, delegated decision by Chong Lin Britto — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
4 Mar 2008
Application received
24 Apr 2008
Delegated decision: Approved · Chong Lin Britto
4 Mar 2008
Application received
24 Apr 2008
Delegated decision: Approved · Chong Lin Britto

Public response

Measure
Count
Total comments
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.