Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Ealing›…Hobbayne wardW7 1LW69 Tennyson Road Hanwell W7 1LW London›P/2011/4287
Planning application · Ealing

P/2011/4287.

69 Tennyson Road Hanwell W7 1LW London

Lawful Development Certificate at 69 Tennyson Road Hanwell W7 1LW London, received 28 Sep 2011 — approved on 24 Oct 2011.

Ealing›Hobbayne›W7 1LW›P/2011/4287
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Approved
Outcome
24 Oct 2011
4 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension (Lawful Development Certificate for Proposed Development)

Reference
P/2011/4287
Type
Certificate of Lawfulness - Proposed
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
28 Sep 2011
Target date
23 Nov 2011
Decision date
24 Oct 2011
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Permitted Development
Premises record
Council register
Reference
P/2011/4287
Type
Certificate of Lawfulness - Proposed
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
28 Sep 2011
Target date
23 Nov 2011
Decision date
24 Oct 2011
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Permitted Development
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 24 Oct 2011 — 4 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
28 Sep 2011
Application received
23 Nov 2011
Statutory target date
24 Oct 2011
Delegated decision: Approved
28 Sep 2011
Application received
23 Nov 2011
Statutory target date
24 Oct 2011
Delegated decision: Approved

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.