Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEalingNorwood Green wardUB2 4LG1 Vine Cottage Tentelow Lane Southall UB2 4LGP/2011/4595
Planning application · Ealing

P/2011/4595.

1 Vine Cottage Tentelow Lane Southall UB2 4LG

Trees at 1 Vine Cottage Tentelow Lane Southall UB2 4LG, received 9 Nov 2011 — refused on 20 Dec 2011.

EalingNorwood GreenUB2 4LGP/2011/4595
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Refused
Outcome
20 Dec 2011
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Rear garden: T1 Beech - Fell

Reference
P/2011/4595
Type
Works to a tree with a TPO
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Council
Received
9 Nov 2011
Validated
21 Nov 2011
Target date
15 Jan 2012
Decision date
20 Dec 2011
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
P/2011/4595
Type
Works to a tree with a TPO
Show all 17 rows
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Council
Received
9 Nov 2011
Validated
21 Nov 2011
Target date
15 Jan 2012
Decision date
20 Dec 2011
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 20 Dec 2011 — 6 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
9 Nov 2011
Application received
21 Nov 2011
Application validated
15 Jan 2012
Statutory target date
20 Dec 2011
Delegated decision: Refused
9 Nov 2011
Application received
21 Nov 2011
Application validated
15 Jan 2012
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
20 Dec 2011
Delegated decision: Refused

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.