Planning application · Ealing
P/2012/4792.
44 Harp Road Hanwell W7 1JE London
Full / Other Planning at 44 Harp Road Hanwell W7 1JE London, received 6 Dec 2012 — approved on 21 Feb 2013.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEaling profile →
Approved
Outcome
21 Feb 2013
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Ealing planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Single storey rear extension
Reference
P/2012/4792
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
W7 1JE
Ward
Council
Received
6 Dec 2012
Validated
2 Jan 2013
Target date
27 Feb 2013
Decision date
21 Feb 2013
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Conditional Consent
Council register
Reference
P/2012/4792
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
W7 1JE
Ward
Council
Received
6 Dec 2012
Validated
2 Jan 2013
Target date
27 Feb 2013
Decision date
21 Feb 2013
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Conditional Consent
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Ealing portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Approved on 21 Feb 2013 — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
6 Dec 2012
Application received
2 Jan 2013
Application validated
27 Feb 2013
Statutory target date
21 Feb 2013
Delegated decision: Approved
6 Dec 2012
Application received
2 Jan 2013
Application validated
27 Feb 2013
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
21 Feb 2013
Delegated decision: Approved
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.