Planning application · Hackney
2003/1984.
32 Gilda Crescent, Hackney, London, N16 6JP
Full / Other Planning at 32 Gilda Crescent, Hackney, London, N16 6JP, received 21 Oct 2003 — approved on 22 Dec 2003 (delegated, Larissa Northridge).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Approved
Outcome
22 Dec 2003
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
3
Documents
3 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a front dormer loft extension
Reference
2003/1984
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
21 Oct 2003
Validated
7 Nov 2003
Target date
10 Feb 2004
Decision date
22 Dec 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2003/1984
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
21 Oct 2003
Validated
7 Nov 2003
Target date
10 Feb 2004
Decision date
22 Dec 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Decision
What happened?
Approved on 22 Dec 2003, delegated decision by Larissa Northridge — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
21 Oct 2003
Application received
7 Nov 2003
Application validated
10 Feb 2004
Statutory target date
22 Dec 2003
Delegated decision: Approved · Larissa Northridge
21 Oct 2003
Application received
7 Nov 2003
Application validated
10 Feb 2004
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
22 Dec 2003
Delegated decision: Approved · Larissa Northridge
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.