Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyHaggerston Ward wardN1 6NUGround Floor Front Unit B2, 9 Hoxton Square, Hackney, London, N1 6NU2004/0567
Planning application · Hackney

2004/0567.

Ground Floor Front Unit B2, 9 Hoxton Square, Hackney, London, N1 6NU

Full / Other Planning at Ground Floor Front Unit B2, 9 Hoxton Square, Hackney, London, N1 6NU, received 11 Mar 2004 — approved on 6 May 2004 (delegated, Nick Clough).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Approved
Outcome
6 May 2004
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Extension of existing ground floor balcony over lightwell at front of building.

Reference
2004/0567
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
11 Mar 2004
Target date
6 May 2004
Decision date
6 May 2004
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2004/0567
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
11 Mar 2004
Target date
6 May 2004
Decision date
6 May 2004
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
2004/0567 Planning -
2004/0567 Planning -
2004/0567 Planning -
2004/0567 Planning -
2004/0567 Planning -
2004/0567 Planning -
2004/0567 Planning -
Show all 4 rows
2004/0567 Planning -

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 6 May 2004, delegated decision by Nick Clough — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
11 Mar 2004
Application received
6 May 2004
Statutory target date
6 May 2004
Delegated decision: Approved · Nick Clough
11 Mar 2004
Application received
6 May 2004
Statutory target date
6 May 2004
Delegated decision: Approved · Nick Clough

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.